Congratulations are in order! Udhayanidhi Stalin seems to have garnered quite a reception with his recent antics. It appears that he’s on a mission to give the BJP’s star campaigner, Rahul Gandhi, a run for his money in the art of political theatrics. Notorious for his vitriolic comments against Sanatan Dharma, Udhayanidhi Stalin is leaving no stone unturned to make a complete joker of himself.
In his latest tirade, which unfolded during a media interaction on Wednesday, September 6, Udhayanidhi Stalin once again refused to apologize for his outrageous statements. He was asked to provide an example of caste discrimination within Sanatan Dharma, and his response left many bewildered.
According to Udhayanidhi Stalin, the recent exclusion of President Droupadi Murmu from the inauguration of the new Parliament complex is an example of caste discrimination under Sanatan Dharma. Yes, you read that correctly. Uncle Stalin, as some might call him, believes that Droupadi Murmu missing the inauguration of the new Parliament is an attempt at caste discrimination. If hypocrisy were a person, it would have been rendered speechless by this statement.
#WATCH | Chennai | On being asked if he can give any example of practices of caste discrimination that need to be eradicated, Tamil Nadu Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin says "President Droupadi Murmu was not invited for the inauguration of the new Parliament building, that is theā¦ pic.twitter.com/dU79QmDaqK
— ANI (@ANI) September 6, 2023
But here’s the irony. When Droupadi Murmu was nominated as the Presidential candidate for the NDA, it was none other than Udhayanidhi Stalin’s own DMK party, along with several other opposition parties, who mocked her status and appearance. They went as far as voting against her in the presidential elections and instead voted for Yashwant Sinha, an upper-caste Brahmin.
Also read: Udayanidhi Stalinās vitriol on Sanatana Dharma is nauseating
Let’s take a closer look at this circus of contradictions. Udhayanidhi Stalin’s claim that Droupadi Murmu’s exclusion from the Parliament inauguration was a caste-based conspiracy is perplexing. For starters, Draupadi Murmuās presence at the inauguration was optional, not compulsory. Besides, when a court case of similar undertone, reached the Supreme Court, they brushed it off, saying it is senseless, to say the least.
Moreover, Udhayanidhi conveniently ignores the fact that his own party was among those who refused to support her candidacy in the presidential race. If Udhayanidhi is genuinely concerned about caste discrimination, perhaps he should start by addressing the hypocrisy within his own political ranks.
The audacity of accusing others of caste discrimination while conveniently overlooking his party’s actions speaks volumes about the lack of credibility in Udhayanidhi Stalin’s statements. It seems that political opportunism and grandstanding are more important to him than genuine concerns about social justice.
Moreover, Udhayanidhi Stalin’s attempt to play the victim card for Droupadi Murmu conveniently ignores the broader context of her nomination. It’s essential to remember that political decisions are often influenced by a variety of factors, including ideology, strategy, and alliances. Painting every decision as an act of discrimination oversimplifies the complex landscape of Indian politics.
Now, one might wonder if Udhayanidhi Stalin suffers from retrograde amnesia or if he possesses the same unique gems that Rahul Gandhi is known for. In the end, it seems that the only one who will benefit from this comedy of errors is the current resident of 7, Lok Kalyan Marg in New Delhi.
Udhayanidhi Stalin’s recent statements and actions only serve to highlight his own hypocrisy and political opportunism. Accusing others of caste discrimination while failing to acknowledge his own party’s actions in the presidential election is a glaring example of double standards.
Support TFI:
Support us to strengthen the āRightā ideology of cultural nationalism by purchasing the best quality garments fromĀ TFI-STORE.COM
