Since the beginning of the row over the killing of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, Justin Trudeau has iterated two things. First, the Indian govt’s involvement, and second, India must cooperate in the probe. The basis of these allegations was some ‘credible evidence’. This whole story seems nicely crafted unless you start investigating reality and connecting the dots.
On Wednesday, Canadian PM Justin Trudeau testified before the Foreign Interference Committee where he said that he had no hard evidence but an intelligence report that the Indian govt might be behind the Nijjar’s killing. His statement makes it pretty clear that he held press conferences to tarnish India’s image globally without any evidence but only fabricated intelligence info that he presented as ‘credible’.
Well well well .. Clown Trudeau admits to the Canadian Parliamentary panel that he’s pointing at India with his “Credible allegations” without any substantive proofs or evidence.
I blamed you without proofs, now you keep defending yourself ..!! pic.twitter.com/raa9Qe5lE5
— Yo Yo Funny Singh (@moronhumor) October 16, 2024
But there is more to it. Canadian PM used the matter as a tool to appease Khalistani voters and stir a wave of nationalism in Canada.
His evidence compliments the statement of India’s Ministry of External Affairs which has time and again said that Canada has failed to provide any evidence worth investigating.
In fact, after recent escalation, MEA issued a statement saying, “What we have heard today only confirms what we have been saying consistently all along – Canada has presented us no evidence whatsoever in support of the serious allegations that it has chosen to level against India and Indian diplomats. The responsibility for the damage that this cavalier behaviour has caused to India-Canada relations lies with Prime Minister Trudeau alone.”
What we have heard today only confirms what we have been saying consistently all along – Canada has presented us no evidence whatsoever in support of the serious allegations that it has chosen to level against India and Indian diplomats. The responsibility for the damage that… pic.twitter.com/9k0ztpFOyA
— ANI (@ANI) October 16, 2024
The development so far reveals that Canadian allegations are baseless and are driven by just intel. But the main question is where did that intel come from? Was it deliberately furnished to Trudeau? Is Trudeau a pawn in the big game?
All answers to these questions lie in a recent interview of Khalistani terrorists and loud mouth hate monger Gurupatwant Singh Pannun. Pannun, who has been used by the US as a pawn in the game stated that he has been in direct contact with the Canadian PMO for the last 2-3 years. He also asserted that he furnished information regarding the alleged ‘Indian spy network’. His statement indicates that it was his information that was used by Trudeau to start this row. Given the ideology of Pannun, it is quite obvious that Trudeau took Canada for a ride on the basis of information from a hate-monger extremist with no wisdom but an urge to work against India’s integrity.
This must also be taken into consideration that Canada time and again iterated sharing the intel with 5 eyes. While most of them remain neutral, the US has been using the issue against India for its well-known pressure tactics.
The US has for long asked India to cooperate in the investigation but the question is when it knows that there is no hard evidence, why in the public domain, it recently said that India is not cooperating instead of slamming Canada for making bilateral relations a mockery.
It is only because it is the US that is at the helm of all this. It is the US that activated its pawn Pannun and doormat Trudeau.
The US, through Pannun, furnished the info, Trudeau seeing the political benefits fell for it and the whole conspiracy theory was weived across India.
This takes us to a very important issue why Canada and the US are asking India to cooperate? Actually, putting allegations is easy but presenting evidence is tough. In the same Foreign Interference Committee, Trudeau said that he wanted India to cooperate and give every info on them so that they could find the evidence.
How on earth can someone cooperate to find some not existing evidence against themselves? India iterated that it didn’t get any evidence and Canada asking India to cooperate to get evidence is sufficient enough to say that Trudeau went on the road with only a dead end ahead. The problem is that by publicly holding PCs without evidence, he has gone so far on that path that he won’t be able to return. The US on the other hand is watching the fire in two houses from its home as usual safely.
