On 10 October 1946, Bengal witnessed one of the darkest nights in its history the Noakhali Hindu Genocide. It was the night of Kojagari Lakshmi Puja, when Hindu Bengalis gathered in devotion, lighting lamps and singing hymns in reverence to the Goddess of Prosperity. But as the full moon rose over Noakhali now part of Bangladesh it shone not on festivity, but on terror. Gholam Sarwar, the hereditary Pir of Daira Sharif, led his private militia, Miyar Fauj, in a brutal massacre that would leave an indelible scar on Bengal’s soul.
The carnage began with the beheading of Rajendra Lal Roy Chowdhury, the Hindu zamindar of Noakhali. His severed head was presented to Sarwar as a trophy of hate. His daughters, along with countless other women, were abducted, violated, and never seen again. That night alone, nearly 400 Hindus were slaughtered and over the next several days, more than 5,000 innocent men, women, and children were killed. Temples were desecrated, homes were burnt, women were raped and mutilated, and entire villages were wiped out. The cries of the victims were silenced by fear, as the perpetrators went unpunished.
The Roots of the Bloodshed: From Direct Action Day to Noakhali
The Noakhali genocide did not erupt in isolation. It was a continuation of the Direct Action Day carnage that had gripped Calcutta in August 1946. Ordered by Mohammed Ali Jinnah and executed under Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy then the Premier of Bengal and head of the Muslim League the Direct Action Day riots had already claimed thousands of Hindu lives in the streets of Calcutta. The call for “Pakistan or Perish” had transformed into a rallying cry for ethnic cleansing.
When the flames of Calcutta dimmed, they travelled eastward. In Noakhali, Gholam Sarwar’s militia took up the cause, declaring jihad against Hindu families. Mobs armed with machetes, spears, and kerosene surrounded Hindu localities, forcing conversions, burning idols, and slaughtering men who refused to recite the kalma. Villages that once echoed with conch shells and temple bells were drowned in screams and gunfire.
Suhrawardy, despite being the head of the provincial government, refused to send help. The British, fatigued by their collapsing empire and eager to see the partition plan succeed, turned a blind eye. For them, the chaos in Bengal was a price worth paying for their “orderly withdrawal.”
The Political Silence of Congress and Nehru’s Indifference
As Noakhali bled, the Indian National Congress led by Jawaharlal Nehru remained disturbingly indifferent. The Congress leadership, obsessed with negotiating power from the departing British, failed to intervene to protect the lives of Hindus in Bengal. Even Mahatma Gandhi’s visit to Noakhali weeks later, walking barefoot through the devastated villages, could not erase the impression that the political elite had abandoned Bengal’s Hindus.
Jawaharlal Nehru, who headed the Interim Government at that time, displayed a callous detachment. His focus was on political optics, not human suffering. Many accounts suggest that Nehru’s attitude toward the East Bengali Hindus whom he often regarded as “provincial and backward” shaped his later policies on refugees. When Hindu survivors from Noakhali fled to India, they found themselves neglected in camps, with little sympathy from Delhi.
The same indifference was evident in November 1946, when police opened fire on Hindu peasants protesting Muslim atrocities in Bihar. Over 400 unarmed Hindu villagers were killed in what was later termed as “riot control.” According to international reports, one village alone saw over 500 deaths, not counting those killed in police firing. The tragedy was later dismissed by Nehru’s administration as a necessary measure to maintain “balance” after Noakhali.
In a letter written by Nehru to local leaders, he asked, “Do you propose to repeat the unfortunate happenings in Bengal by killing the Muslims in Bihar? Is this the way in which you are showing your culture and civilisation?” These words devoid of empathy for the Hindu victims revealed the misplaced moral parity that allowed genocide to be brushed aside as “communal unrest.”
The Forgotten Testimonies and the Erasure of Truth
Much of the documentation about the Noakhali massacre was later suppressed or erased from official records. The colonial administration, eager to portray partition as an inevitable necessity, downplayed the scale of the genocide. Several foreign media outlets, including Australian and American correspondents, reported that the number of Hindu deaths ran into thousands, yet official figures were deliberately reduced to “hundreds.”
Survivors’ accounts speak of unimaginable horror entire families wiped out, women jumping into ponds to escape rape, and Hindu men forced to convert at gunpoint. Those who survived fled across the border to Tripura, Assam, and West Bengal, carrying little more than the memory of devastation. For decades, their suffering remained absent from textbooks, their stories silenced by the post-independence political narrative that sought harmony at the cost of historical truth.
The aftermath of Noakhali shaped the refugee crisis that would unfold after Partition in 1947. Millions of East Bengali Hindus, haunted by the memory of 1946, crossed into India, rebuilding their lives from ashes. Yet, the political establishment treated them as an inconvenience rather than victims of ethnic cleansing. The very people who suffered the brunt of communal violence were branded “encroachers” in independent India a tragic irony that persists to this day.
Remembering Noakhali: The Duty of a Civilisation
Noakhali was not merely a massacre; it was a civilisational wound. It exposed how fanaticism, when left unchecked, can turn neighbours into executioners and faith into a weapon. It also revealed how political ambition and colonial apathy can enable genocide under the garb of governance.
For the descendants of East Bengali Hindus, remembrance is not just history it is identity. The Noakhali victims were not just numbers; they were fathers, mothers, and children who died upholding their faith. Their memory demands acknowledgment, not silence.
As India observes the anniversary of the Noakhali Hindu Genocide each year, it must do so with honesty and resolve. It must teach this chapter in schools, document the survivors’ voices, and honour those who perished with dignity. Only by remembering Noakhali can the nation ensure that such horrors are never repeated.
A Nation That Remembers Never Perishes
Noakhali stands as a haunting reminder of what happens when politics fails humanity. It was the blood price paid for the creation of Pakistan, the silence of the British Raj, and the moral blindness of India’s political leadership. But it was also a testament to resilience the refusal of a people to surrender their dharma even in the face of annihilation.
Today, the truest tribute to those who died in Noakhali is remembrance. To remember their courage, their suffering, and their unyielding faith is to reaffirm the strength of our civilisation. For a nation that remembers its wounds is one that never allows them to be inflicted again.
