Former Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud recently appeared on BBC’s HARDtalk, where he foiled vested agenda BBC host Stephen Sackur tried to peddle. The discussion covered issues of alleged political interference in the judiciary, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to his home, and major Supreme Court judgments, including those on Article 370, the Ram Temple, and the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). He firmly answered the questions and debunked the propaganda, the Islamo-leftist ecosystem has been long trying to propagate.
On Judiciary’s Independence and Political Pressure
DY Chandrachud dismissed allegations that the Indian judiciary operates under political influence. Responding to a New York Times editorial that claimed the ruling BJP exploits the courts for its benefit, he stated that the 2024 general elections proved India is not moving toward a one-party system. He highlighted that regional parties continue to thrive, demonstrating the strength of Indian democracy.
Regarding opposition leaders facing legal challenges, he countered that the Supreme Court has consistently protected personal liberties. He cited the court’s record of granting bail to politicians and activists, including staying Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s conviction, allowing him to resume parliamentary duties.
Dynasty in Judiciary and Gender Representation
When asked whether the judiciary is dominated by upper-caste elites, Chandrachud rejected the notion, emphasizing that over 50% of new district judiciary recruits are women, with some states reporting figures as high as 60-70%. He acknowledged that gender balance in higher courts is still evolving but expressed optimism that increasing female representation in lower courts would lead to greater gender diversity at the top.
Article 370 and Jammu & Kashmir
Chandrachud defended the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the abrogation of Article 370, arguing that it was always intended as a temporary provision. He noted that the Supreme Court had emphasized the restoration of democratic governance in Jammu & Kashmir and that elections had taken place peacefully, proving democracy had succeeded in the region. He also reiterated that the government had committed to restoring Jammu & Kashmir’s statehood.
Ram Temple Judgment and Faith in Judiciary
The former CJI categorically denied claims that he had sought divine intervention for the Ram Temple judgment. He clarified that social media misrepresented his statements, asserting that his faith does not compromise his judicial impartiality. He emphasized that judges must be even-handed with all religious groups while maintaining personal beliefs.
PM Modi’s Visit to His Home
Addressing concerns over Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to his residence during Ganesh Chaturthi, Chandrachud downplayed its significance. He said that elementary courtesies between high constitutional functionaries should not be overinterpreted. He also pointed out that the Supreme Court had issued crucial rulings against the government, including the electoral bonds case, before and after the visit, proving its independence.
