Ruchika Sharma, the controversial distorian who is notorious for whitewashing the barbaric deeds of Islamists recently engaged in an ugly Twitter spat with Islamists where the latter accused her of “committing blasphemy”, an act they consider punishable by separating the head from the torso – Sar Tan se Juda (STSJ).
She was hounded by her own bruvver’s for taking a stand for the Iranian women who are fighting against the Islamic regime and for believing hijab as a symbol of oppression. Not only was Ruchika hounded but a campaign was launched against her demanding her arrest for “committing blasphemy”.
Masih Alinejad, the Iranian Journalist and women’s rights activist on 7th of November posted a video on her Twitter handle where Ahoo Daryaei, a former science and research university student could be seen protesting against the Iranian regime by not covering herself with hijab. Quoting the video, Ruchika Sharma stood with the protesting woman. She wrote, “It’s happening! Women, take notes. When one starts the baton of inquilab you carry it further and not stomp it down. Aise hi aayega inquilab”, upon which her bruvvers to her tweet to hurl abuses upon her and soon the spat reached to the argument of whether hijab is oppressive or a freedom of choice.
It’s happening! Women, take notes. When one starts the baton of inquilab you carry it further and not stomp it down. Aise hi aayega inquilab 💪🏻💪🏻 https://t.co/sKcI1ZqNyu
— Dr. Ruchika Sharma (@tishasaroyan) November 7, 2024
When a Twitter user praised the hijab and criticized liberalism as an ideology that promotes shamelessness as progressive and views decency as outdated, Ruchika Sharma reacted with anger. In reply, the controversial historian wrote, “Your invisible burger won’t decide what is decency and shamelessness for a woman.”
She wrote “Decency, shamelessness tera invisible burger in the sky decide nahin karega. Baith ja, chhote. Every woman can decide her morality for herself. The illusion here is wearing hijab somehow protects you, makes you better in the eyes of some invisible burger in the sky.”
Decency, shamelessness tera invisible burger in the sky decide nahin karega. Baith ja, chhote. Every woman can decide her morality for herself. The illusion here is wearing hijab somehow protects you, makes you better in the eyes of some invisible burger in the sky.
— Dr. Ruchika Sharma (@tishasaroyan) November 8, 2024
Upon this, Islamists confronted her, hurled the vilest of abuses against her, and also accused her of blasphemy. Islamists started demanding the arrest of Ruchika Sharma for allegedly comparing the Islamic God Allah to an invisible burger. #ArrestRuchikaharma was being used by many demanding her arrest. The spat was not only limited to trolls and Ruchika, but Darab Farooqui, the notorious face in Islamist circles too joined to take shots at Ruchika for allegedly mocking the Islamic God. Darab tried to label her as biased for mocking Allah but not Hindu Gods and Goddess.
Dear Ruchika,
Either you do not comprehend what I am saying or you are pretending to be ignorant. So let me make it crystal-clear what my issue is with you here.
But first, let me clarify that if you believe Hijab is oppressive, it is your personal view; it does not… https://t.co/SYERp4CzIj
— Darab Farooqui (@darab_farooqui) November 9, 2024
Darab wrote “Dear Ruchika, Either you do not comprehend what I am saying or you are pretending to be ignorant. So let me make it crystal-clear what my issue is with you here. But first, let me clarify that if you believe Hijab is oppressive, it is your personal view; it does not constitute the absolute truth, thus I have no problem. Also, I believe that no woman should be subjected to slut-shaming or character assassination. So I condemn the attacks directed against you. Now let’s get back to the point of conflict. I’ve read both of your articles and watched the video. There isn’t a single sentence of Mockery about any Hindu God. If I missed it, please show it to me, and I’ll gladly concede. When you say, “People who follow the invisible burger in the sky”. The contempt and ridicule is directed specifically at Muslims, Islam, and Allah. It is not even relevant to Hindu gods, as Allah resides in the sky, also known as the seventh heaven.”
Darab continued, “When you call Allah an Invisible Burger, you are not only criticizing or ridiculing it, but also demeaning and denigrating it. It is a direct and precise insult and mocking of Islam, Muslims, and Allah. I did not see any of these aspects in any of your articles. For example, in the Krishna piece, I did not see you mocking or ridiculing the Brahmanical Krishna. And, as a scholar, I’m sure you’re well aware of the common mockery of Hindu gods, such as Hanuman or Ganesha or even Krishna. So, just as you mocked Allah, Islam and Muslims, do you have any evidence that you mocked Hindus and Hindu gods?”
Wow… https://t.co/GCPpd4c5Ol pic.twitter.com/LXUmhkZ6Si
— Dr. Ruchika Sharma (@tishasaroyan) November 10, 2024
Another Islamist handle found attacking leftists like Ruchika as foolish as she is useful for them in their fight against Hindus and when their use gets over, Islamist should throw them out. He wrote “Genz Muslims don’t know how to play chess and deceive their enemy and win. They shouldn’t oppose or insult liberals who are against Muslims in small things like hijab, they should use them to defeat right-wingers and after their use is finished, we can throw them out.”
Ruchika Sharma and her infamous drive to whitewash history and absolve Muslim barbarians with conspiracy theories
It is pertinent to highlight that Ruchika Sharma is the same distorian who out of nowhere blamed Brahmins for the burning of Nalanda University, giving a free pass to Invader Bakhityar Khilji. The Islamic invader at the end of the 12th century attacked the university, killed the Brahmins present there, and set the University ablaze. It is believed that Nalanda’s libraries kept burning for over three months. But Ruchika Sharma somehow tried to peddle the myth of Brahmins burning down Nalanda which pushes the Islamo-leftist propaganda of portraying Brahmins as villains for their goal towards the eradication of Sanatan Dharma.
