In what has given a major twist to what promises to be the most crowded Democratic primary scrum in the history of United States Presidential race, Tulsi Gabbard, a Democrat nominee, has hit out at Hillary Clinton after the latter took an indirect accusation at Gabbard accusing her of being groomed by the Russians for third-party run. The former Democrat Presidential nominee said, “I’m not making any predictions, but I think they’ve got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate.” She also said,“She’s the favourite of the Russians.”
It must be noted that although Clinton did not take any names, only five women are running for the POTUS- Gabbard, Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar and Marianne Williamson. None of the other women have been accused of being backed by Russia, therefore it is clear that Clinton targeted Gabbard with the innuendos remark. What followed was a Twitter thread that absolutely destroyed Hillary Clinton.
Taking to Twitter, Gabbard said, “Great! Thank you, @HillaryClinton. You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain. From the day I announced my candidacy, there has been a concerted campaign to destroy my reputation. We wondered who was behind it and why. Now we know — it was always you, through your proxies and powerful allies in the corporate media and war machine, afraid of the threat I pose.
It’s now clear that this primary is between you and me. Don’t cowardly hide behind your proxies. Join the race directly.”
With this Tweet, Gabbard has exposed the kind of role that Hillary Clinton played in the regime change was during the days of the Obama administration, of which the ongoing Syria war is a living example. This comes as a major shot in the arm for Tulsi’s campaign. Speaking to CBS News, about Hillary’s despicable remarks, Gabbard spoke even more clearly about how Hillary Clinton championed the long-held foreign policy of the US acting as the world’s police, overthrowing and toppling dictators around the world. The war in Iraq or for that matter the one in Libya to overthrow the Gaddafi regime are glaring examples of how Clinton has emerged as the key face of Obama dispensation’s regime change wars.
Gabbard’s foreign policy stance is in line with popular opinion. Within the US, it represents the popular sentiments towards those who have perished due to the regime change wars and have spent a good part of their lives in the military barracks. Gabbard is one of those veterans who served in such venues. Today, when she is speaking against those the warmongering lobby, that still believes in, and seeks to benefit from, the American imperialism, she is being hounded by her own party. She is being slandered today for speaking against such war-mongering policy of intiating regime change wars that really is the legacy of Hillary Clinton. Members of her own party have no started making despicable, innuendos remarks against her.
Realising the threat that she poses to the strong lobby behind the foreign policy of acting as world’s police and initiating regime change wars, the vested interests led by Hillary Clinton are making desperate attempts of damaging Gabbard’s reputation and also blacking out her effective campaign. Her US $ 50 million lawsuit against Google, for example, illustrates how her Presidential campaign is being silenced by the liberal tech giants. The entire liberal establishment, with the CNN being the most prominent of such outlets, in the US has not been able to digest Gabbard’s effective foreign policy agenda that militates against the established Obama/Democrat endorsed narrative.
Support for Tulsi Gabbard keeps rising even though the mainstream media in the United States has blacked out her campaign and has virtually ignored her. Even if her own party is able to sideline Gabbard through the influential ecosystem that they have, she is set to make an impact with her effective narrative. If not a Presidential nominee, it seems that in all probability she will make it to the Secretary of State given that her campaign is centred on foreign policy and she is effectively taking on those who initiated the regime change wars, that also clearly resonates with the popular public opinion within the US.