I was recently talking with friends about the weirdness of Lefties, as I so often do. They really are a weird, incomprehensible bunch. In this instance, though, it was to do with their icons. You know, people like Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Che Guevara….. These are all mass killers, who have killed in millions when they rule, and thousands if they didn’t hold that power. When I said that, I drew a blank stare. These guys, these educated, supposedly well-informed people, had little idea of the misdeeds of these atrocious men.
I reeled, but then realised why. They have simply not been told about this ever! The news media has been so utterly biased towards left that they simply gloss over anything bad by the communist engines, past or present. I learned all this via my exposure to international journalism. Through my involvement in the precursors of social media: the blogs and the forums. But isn’t it the duty of a comprehensive education to give us that knowledge? Think about it, we keep learning about the umpteen “aandolans” by the pre-independence congress and how we owe all to them, but we have little to no idea what the geo-politics of the world are shaped by.
I don’t remember ever reading anything negative about communism in my textbooks. Stalin and his purges led to the death of 25 million people. Thats several times the worst estimates of Jewish deaths during Holocaust. We had no idea. I studied in Kendriya Vidyalaya in 80’s and remember reading about the great prosperity brought to USSR, and about Mao’s ‘Great Leap Forward’ leading to food security for China. I never heard that Mao’s rule led to death of millions and imprisonment/torture of many more.
The truth is, Indian academia is littered with cronies of Left, and that reflects in out textbooks. They pit Communism as a missed opportunity, they pit Indus Valley civilisation as a broken link, and they pit Islamic invasions and “Aryan invasion” as equivalent. They exalt India’s “tryst with socialism” as a grand foundation for prosperity….. In short, they are written by the cronies of people in power for the last 60 odd years.
Is this arrangement set in stone? Of course not. Of course successive congress governments never have brought in enough right wing voices to bring a balance, though. So is it okay for a centre-right government to bring in more right wing voices? If relativists hold sway in cultural realm, would it be a crime to get some nationalists in? Well, of course according to the left it would. Who is comfortable with their monopoly being broken? They will cry bloody murder, of course. They call it an attempt to Saffronise the education, as if referring to a part of the tricolour is a term of derision. They call it revisionism, as if revising incorrect or incomplete history is a sin. They scream in their shrill voices from their high chairs that they alone hold the keys to knowledge and all need to bow to their superior wisdom.
So thats what’s happening. I don’t like fantasies that claim that Indian scientists invented atom bombs, or planes, or mars rovers, but would it be so bad to show the intellectual achievements of Indian civilisation? Whom would it hurt to show that socialism has failed to bring prosperity the world over? Would it really harm the secular fabric too much if the invaders and looters from middle east are called barbarian looters instead of noble rulers? Would it be wrong if people know what the experience of living under a communist dictatorship is really like?
I don’t think so. Lets tell those lefties that they don’t run the country anymore. Like the homosexuals embraced the term ‘gay’ in the West, let’s embrace the word Saffron. Not as a symbol of religious symbolism as intended but as Indian centre-right badge of honor.
Let them realise that this is a diverse country and diverse views include those from the right. They must learn to respect them more, and worship their mass-murdering heroes a little less.
It’s just not possible. You completely read my mind.
Hi Jayesh,
I am not sure if would understand my POV as from the very beginning of your article you are totally biased against communism.
Yes I do agree, most of the Communist leaders when they were elected to rule turned into mass murderers. But when you are looking into the dark side of it you should understand how communism started and what were its implications. I don’t know which leftist people you met but in general I have seen leftist people are much educated in history than regular people.
You should start with the basics of Communism, the ideology which states that the nation is no one’s property and the resources should be shared with all its people. This ideology though it sounds very good in paper but in reality it’s an ideal situation which cannot be implemented in reality. But, this was the ideology which was behind all the revolutions that took place in the 19th and 20th century and led to the fall of empires. Please read the history behind the fall of the Russian czar in 1917 (Russian czar was no good person). You may admit or not but communist ideology played a big part in the Indian freedom movement also (Netaji was pro-communist). In 2011, the “Occupy wall street” was also a communist movement. Now you may get a faint idea why communism is still in vogue.
Now about the mass murder, according to the communist manifesto “Communism considers morality to be relative, to be a class matter. Depending upon circumstances and the political situation, any act, including murder, even the killing of thousands, could be good or could be bad. It all depends upon class ideology.” This may seem abstract, cruel and unethical but lets now consider an example. Put yourself in the place of Indian freedom fighter, will you think twice before killing an innocent white person for your country? As I mentioned Netaji was pro-communist and under his leadership several 100 Britishers were killed would you call him a terrorist or mass murderer? Obviously not because he is one of us. Come to present day situation, we all condemn the killing of CRPF jawans by the maoists in naxalite areas but all those people who are criticizing these adivasis have they cared to see the condition in which they live? They are also Indians, more Indian than the invading Aryans. We should introspect why the normal people out there like you and me have taken guns rather than sowing seeds in the field. People out there eat ant eggs to survive. In the last 60 yrs their conditions have worsened, moreover now the Industrialists along with the govt want to take their land and the forest, the only thing they possess. we should focus more on the overall improvement of their livelihood rather than putting them indiscriminately behind the bars. Coming back to original point, I am not at all supporting the mass killing but because these leaders killed millions whatever may be the cause doesn’t undermine the communist ideology.
You should introspect why till today several highly qualified people like Binayak Sen, Arundhati Ray, etc support communism and their movement. I believe you don’t consider yourself more learned than these people. Communism is not about fighting the right wing, it is about fighting for the oppressed for equal rights. People may get corrupt but the ideology doesn’t.
Also, I want to clearly specify that the current Indian communist political parties are total bullshit, they just have communist name to it and nothing more than that.
I want to sign off by saying if you are writing/reading/researching on any subject always look for both the positive and the negative aspects of it.
Thanks.
Ok. I disagree fundamentally. You say that the ideology of everyone being equal is attractive. It’s not. That’s the recipe for a totalitarian state.
You said you weren’t trying to justify the violence, but you were. What makes you think that I approve of CRPF violence against innocent tribals? Of course not. Freedom struggle is a false analogy. A group of people denied their liberties have a right to fight for them. No one has a right to impose their ideology upon others. This is another result of bad information: false equivalence. Freedom fighter and dictator are opposing sides. Don’t try to make them seem morally equal.
Lastly, I totally dismiss your appeal to authority. (Look it up. It’s a classical logical fallacy) What is Ms Roy’s education? Can you tell me without googling? And what do you know about my education? And did you read the article? What makes you believe that the views imbibed from a biased education system make for a superior intellect?
What is this “aryan invasion” ? I thought they call it “aryan migration” these days…. And by the way this aryan invasion/migration theory is now history, we have many indian population genetic studies which refute it. Please refer –
absolutely right. communism may have some good, but unfortunate those in power have been more tyrants than the amount of good they did. practice of communism is now irrelevant to the times anybody still clinging on to those thoughts need to understand their history better than to believe the untruths they have brainwashed themselves into and put it all into history books to brainwash the rest of the world. One thing is certain as I saw it, communists are better realists in the economic sense in India, which is why governance has always turned left, congress especially who have always piggy backed on communist fundamentals but kept the seat of power …
fully agree, bhai. mulla and commie slum must be wiped. slum is slum. marmarke gharVapsi. Aakhiri nabi modi failaega Bhagwa.
You are putting Stalin and Che in the same bracket of mass murderers. This clearly shows your lack of knowledge on the topic. You are not even worth debating.
Care to share why can’t be stalin and che cannot be called mass murderers? Without that calling someone not worth debating doesn’t solve the purpose of a discussion!!
Exactly why Hitler and Modi both Nationalists cant be called Mass Murderers by their Bhakts. And debating with Bhakts doesn’t solve the purpose of a discussion!
Che with castro overthrew Batista regime.very good. After that he executed all of Batista folks without trial. He massacred homo sexuals. Basically killed anyone on the opposite direction of his moral compass.
He then went on his conquest to force his rotten communism on every frigging country. Congo, Argentina ,everywhere.
Thank god Bolivian army killed him. Che was a psychopath
Exactly. Other than scale, there is little difference.
One big difference is that there are fewer Stalin T-shirts, of course.
Read your comments and reflect. Who seems more close minded, you or the people deride?
A right wing page, favoring Babri and Godhra offenders, is writing about Mass Murder of Communists.
Yeh to too much ho gaya! :O