ASI survey at the Gyanvapi complex: In a resolute stance that echoes the essence of secular democracy, the Supreme Court of India has lent its unequivocal support to the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) survey in and around the Gyanvapi complex. The decision underscores the paramount significance of upholding justice while respecting the diverse perspectives and faiths that comprise the nation’s fabric.
The Allahabad High Court’s steadfast verdict on the Gyanvapi matter has set the legal precedent for the Supreme Court. With a pragmatic approach devoid of superfluous rhetoric, the High Court’s judgment was a testament to the need for rationality and equity. Overruling the verdict was impracticable; hence, the Supreme Court wisely endorsed the verdict as an unwavering foundation for its subsequent actions.
A pivotal moment came when the Supreme Court dismissed a challenge by Islamists to halt the ASI survey at the Gyanvapi complex. This move cemented the stance that the pursuit of truth and justice prevails above all else. The district court order permitted excavation if required, yet the ASI pledged to adopt non-invasive methodologies to safeguard the existing structure. This cautious approach demonstrates the commitment to preserving the historical and spiritual significance of the Gyanvapi complex.
Embodying this spirit, a three-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud upheld the High Court order and directed that the survey be conducted using non-invasive methods. This prudent decision ensures the preservation of both faith and heritage, reinforcing the principle that the pursuit of truth is pivotal for a just resolution.
Also read: Gyanvapi Survey: The truth of Gyanvapi cannot be concealed anymore
In response to objections raised by the Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Committee, Chief Justice Chandrachud’s retort was resolute: “What may be frivolous to you is faith for the others.” This statement encapsulates the essence of religious pluralism and the understanding that beliefs vary, yet the pursuit of truth remains unwavering.
The Allahabad High Court’s rejection of the Committee’s plea against the Varanasi district court’s order further solidified the judicial stance. Chief Justice Pritinker Diwaker’s bench emphasized that a scientific survey was a crucial step towards justice and a fair resolution. The court’s endorsement of the survey’s significance and the well-justified decision to involve the ASI underscores the court’s commitment to uncovering historical truths.
In light of these developments, the pursuit of truth through the scientific survey instills hope that justice will ultimately prevail. The restoration of the Gyanvapi complex to its rightful claimants is a matter of both historical accuracy and ethical responsibility. In embracing this course, the Supreme Court exemplifies a harmonious balance between faith and fact, underscoring the nation’s commitment to unity in diversity.
The Supreme Court’s resolute endorsement of the ASI survey at the Gyanvapi complex is a significant stride towards truth, justice, and coexistence. It stands as a testimony to India’s democratic values, where the pursuit of faith and facts converge, and the quest for harmony and equity reigns supreme.
Support TFI:
Support us to strengthen the ‘Right’ ideology of cultural nationalism by purchasing the best quality garments from TFI-STORE.COM
Also Watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCO5QozsjD8