Kiren Rijiju transfer: The winds of change have swept through the corridors of power as Kiren Rijiju has been officially transferred from the Ministry of Law to the Ministry of Earth Sciences. While some struggle to come to terms with this reality, others are left fuming in its wake. However, destiny had long foretold this inevitable shift, and now it has come to pass, casting its enchanting spell.
Kiren Rijiju transfer: All Gas, No Substance
In politics, effective leadership and decision-making are crucial for the smooth functioning of any government. However, the recent removal of Kiren Rijiju from his position highlights the consequences of an all talk, no substance approach when dealing with the collegium. Of late, Kiren Rijiju was transferred from the all-important Ministry of Law, Arjun Ram Meghwal taking his place instead.
Look, whether you agree with the decision-making and policies of the Modi government or not but there is no denying the fact that a new trend has emerged in the Indian political discourse post-2014, emphasizing the paramount importance of effective leadership and astute decision-making for the smooth functioning of the government. The recent turn of events, where Kiren Rijiju was abruptly removed from his position, serves as a poignant reminder of the perils associated with relying solely on rhetoric and lacking tangible accomplishments when confronted with the intricacies of the collegium. In this recent episode, Kiren Rijiju was compelled to bid farewell to the prestigious Ministry of Law, making way for Arjun Ram Meghwal to take the helm. These developments compel us to reflect on the significance of substance over empty promises in the realm of politics.
Also read: BJP kept on neglecting Hindus and expected to vote for them. The result is Karnataka
Now coming on to the one of the key issues that plagued Rijiju was his failure to establish a meaningful dialogue with the members of the collegium. No wonder there is a saying, âAction speaks louder than wordsâ. Rijiju’s all talk, no substance approach resulted in a lack of understanding and cooperation, further exacerbating the challenges he faced within the collegium.
âHeâs not the firstâ
However, Kiren Rijiju is not the first to face the music for his rather lacklustre approach to his responsibilities. Previously, the removal of prominent ministers like Ravi Shankar Prasad and Prakash Javadekar had already caught the attention of political observers. While the government stated the need for rejuvenation and restructuring as the rationale for these changes, there was widespread speculation about the true motives behind the reshuffle. However, the actual reason was simple: Despite what critics may wish, there is no place for mere lip service in the Modi government.
Moreover, Rijiju’s inability to present a coherent and well-thought-out vision for the judiciary further undermined his credibility. The collegium demands a deep understanding of legal intricacies and an ability to articulate clear objectives. Rijiju’s lack of expertise and vision left him ill-prepared to handle the demands and expectations of the collegium, leading to a growing sense of dissatisfaction and mistrust among its members.
Furthermore, Rijiju’s failure to address the concerns and grievances raised by the collegium further strained the relationship between the executive and judiciary. The collegium’s decisions have a far-reaching impact on the justice system, and it is crucial for the executive to engage in constructive dialogue to ensure a harmonious functioning. Unfortunately, Rijiju’s approach seemed more focused on maintaining appearances rather than actively seeking solutions and working towards a common goal.
Also read: Kerala Story ban: Perfect Balancing, the Chandrachud way!
To put it at the end the ouster of Kiren Rijiju transfer highlights the repercussions of an all talk, no substance approach when dealing with the collegium. His failure to establish effective communication, articulate a clear vision, and address the concerns of the collegium undermined his leadership and effectiveness as the Minister of Law and Justice. This serves as a stark reminder that political leaders must not merely rely on legendary speeches but must also back their words with tangible actions. It is a testament to the importance of sincerity, substance, and meaningful engagement in the realm of governance.
Support TFI:
Support us to strengthen the âRightâ ideology of cultural nationalism by purchasing the best quality garments from TFI-STORE.COM
