Social media is replete with videos of a blood-thirsty mob, consisting mainly of Burqa-clad women and Muslim men charging at deployed police personnel in Northeast Delhi during the riots which were initiated just before US President Donald Trump’s touchdown at Ahmedabad.
DCP Shahadra, Amit Sharma sustained grievous injuries after facing an unprecedented onslaught by a marauder-like mob. He has also suffered injuries on the left side of the brain, extending his recovery period to over three months. Constable Ratan Lal was killed, in all likelihood, by the same mob which attacked DCP Sharma, as he was trying to save him. ACP Anuj Sharma was also injured while he was saving DCP Sharma from the mob.
From 0.08 onwards you can see a large group of Burqa clad women stoning handful of policemen who are trying to form a human shield to protect fellow cops from getting killed. This is the ugly reality of Islamist violence on streets of Delhi.https://t.co/XikHvaY7xi
— Divya Kumar Soti (@DivyaSoti) March 5, 2020
DCP Sharma’s wife, Pooja Sharma expressed anguish over the fact that women were involved in the mob-lynching-like-assault on her husband. “My husband had gone to have a dialogue with the protesters. It was a group of only women. They took off his helmet and then the mob attacked him,” she explained. She also asked the government to ensure strict action against those involved, adding that her husband was still recovering.
Those fulminating over a false narrative of ‘Muslims under threat’ in India and abroad are the same people who are maintaining a stony silence on the murder of constable Ratan Lal, and the fatal assault on DCP Sharma and his colleagues, by the women of a community which is allegedly under threat. The Delhi riots are a new. Riots have never before seen large scale and active participation of women before, unlike now, where it seems, women have proved to be more insensitive and murderous than men.
Many video clips have emerged, showing how women of the community under threat almost flaunt their homicidal tendencies.
https://twitter.com/shaksingh/status/1232357580606857216?s=20
In the above attached tweets, a woman is seen holding her grievously injured skull. When asked by a boy (probably the individual recording the video) whether she was beaten by the police, the lady reveals that she fell into a drain during the mob murder spree, only after throwing bricks at the police personnel trying to contain the situation. While in the video above the woman states that she fell into a well, in the video below, the narrative takes a polar turn.
https://twitter.com/PoliticalKida/status/1232379813878353921?s=20
Here it is seen that a woman is screeching at the top of her voice to a crowd of media perhaps, alleging that the old woman with an injured head was infact lathi-charged by the police. What a glaring reversal of narrative.
Sadly, women in burqas assaulting policemen have become beacons of feminism in India, while the irony of a burqa on, stays put. We cannot afford to be apologetic and squeamish about the reality of it all – these women are nothing short of terrorists. Terrorists who are brainwashed to the extent that they are on the roads not because they understand concepts like CAA and NRC, but perhaps because the word going around in their ghettos is that their ‘deen’ is under threat.
Think about it. How do a group of policemen react when a thousand-strong mob of burqa-clad women are charging at them with stones and sticks, coupled with the fact that men were also present as the second-tier of assault? And then the narrative which finds place in worthless publications around the world is that the police uses brute force against democratic protests. The protests were anything but democratic. The closest they got to democracy was when the national flag was used as a stick by protesters to beat policemen.
While women are thought to be empathetic and understanding in nature, what was unleashed on the roads of northeast Delhi was a crowd of women indoctrinated by the jihadi mindset, not thinking twice before committing criminalities. The same mindset caused these women to be unaffected by the death of two infants at Shaheen Bagh, who were exposed to the winter chills on a daily basis by their parents looking for easy money and free Biryani.
Indian media’s fascination for revolutionaries under burqas is not newfound. During the Jamia violence, the media had discovered ‘sheroes’ by the names of Ayesha Renna and Ladeeda. Upon a bit of digging on their social media profiles, it was found that Ladeeda hates being called ‘Hindustani Muslim’ and is inspired by a girl holding AK 56.
Ayesha Renna has openly expressed solidarity for Yakub Memon and was crying on social media when Yakub Memon was hanged for his role in the 1993 Mumbai blasts which killed 257 people. Renna in a Facebook post apologised to Yakub as she claimed she was helpless in a fascist country. Ladeeda, meanwhile, openly called for Jihad through her Facebook account. Ladeeda also showed middle fingers to India in light of the Kathua rape and murder. Aysha shares the same views as she has shared the post where Ladeeda has openly called for Jihad.
There is no reason to believe that Muslim women are somehow less capable of effecting Jihad against kaafirs. The indoctrination of women is more than complete, and they somehow turn out to be more lethal than men. The radicalization of women should be a cause of worry for Indian authorities, as women are usually thought to be peaceful, often given the benefit of doubt by law enforcing agencies, unlike men, who the uniformed personnel are very well trained to handle. While women enjoy such exceptionalism, for them to behave in such a manner is nothing short of despicable.