A visit to Israel by Modi has shook the media used to eulogising the “ill” planned Nehruvian foreign policy. The media tamed and trained under the watchful eye of left liberals is gasping for breath and drooling from their mouths as Modi rightly chose to give Palestine a miss.
Modi’s Israel visit and his hearty welcome has brought about a refreshing change in India’s foreign policy. The meeting between Modi and Netanyahu is symbolic of the much needed change in antiquated ideas of sham kindness and generosity which have cost India dearly in the past.
India’s so called policy in the past years has shown lack of knowledge, evolution and planning. The path followed by Nehru claimed as being just was not nearly so as he sacrificed the nation at the cost of his vague sense of morality. Praise needy Nehru kept his distance from Israel to avoid angering the Muslims in India which at the outset was downright imprudent as the radicals should have already moved to Pakistan, the basis of two nation policy being religion. And the abject failure of the policy can be seen today by not only the presence of radical Islam among us, the religio-political war in Kashmir and the pray for Gaza banner holders.
Jews were the survivors of the holocaust and calling arabs “daughty” is quite a travesty Sh. Gopal Krishna Gandhi has indulged in. It is interesting to note that the Jews who pushed out Arabs were met with a cold shoulder while the Nehruvian ideology followers turned a blind eye to the displaced Kashmiri Pandiths who are the survivors of the Kashmiri ethnic holocaust and still living in camps. The chasm between the western-elites and the masses is palpable from the fact that they have chosen to brush aside the Kashmiri Pandiths when Sh. Nehru was himself one of them.
The partial moral righteousness of Sh. Gopal Krishna Gandhi is apparent with knocking on the doors of law at odd hours for a clemency deal for a terrorist which appears at best as a stepping stone for his claim of Vice Presidency.
While Israel strengthened itself and quickly rose to power, the Nehruvian policies kept India at bay with the idea of a fools paradise floating in their minds that the arab world would support them in Kashmir, cross border terrorism or the overall stance towards Pakistan. Over half a century has passed since then but the followers of that failed policy continue to believe in the hallucination and swear by it.
Everybody knows that the mayhem in Kashmir is an outcome of Nehru’s ill planned policies with a lack of foresight which itself is a different matter to know and completely different to acknowledge. The belief that all said and done by Nehru-Gandhi is absolute is the biggest downfall for the charlatans.
Nehru’s policy on China was and is an epitome of failure. He showed not only a lack of “justness” but a rather callous attitude towards the people of Tibet.
Nehru failed to pay heed to warnings by Sv. Sh. K.M Pannikar, India’s ambassador to the nationalist government in Nanking. He went on to boast about his relations with “I have some slight reputation with the leaders of communist China because of the medical missions we had sent. I have corresponded with Mai Tse-tung and other leaders in the past. All this might help…“.
Once the Chinese prepared for the assault on Tibet, Nehru was busy in fashioning a bigger blunder by championing the cause of Communist China into the UN! He went on to say before the invasion of Tibet that “Time is very much in favour of China and I do not see why they should not take the advantage of this fact.” Then, what makes the action of China more equal than the action of Israel? Nothing. Is it still, that the love for the arabs is driving the Nehruvian followers up the wall or is it silence to partake in the ‘two-state solution’?
Once China “liberated” Tibet, he forced the nationalist government to vacate it’s seat in General Assembly and Security council. Nehru firmly believed that China posed no military danger to India and we all know which direction that went.
Tibetan delegation had pleaded with Nehru that he should urge for the talks to be held in India which Nehru refused. He went on to say that “we can not give any help in the event of invasion.” And progressed to rubbing salt on their wounds by saying “Nor can any other country.” Chinese troops after invasion massacred over 4,000 Tibetans and the geopolitical effect of this invasion on India was massive as it placed India in an obvious position of disadvantage. No matter what justifications are made or how hard the left historians try to dilute the truth and push their Nehruvian agenda, the people will remember the truth, the truth being: Policies of Nehru were a failure and did nothing to strengthen the position of India in the world. The left “scholars” now stand in front of Indians who refuse to be blinded by lies and deceit peddled by them.
Modi went to Israel and gave Palestine a skip as Palestine has neither anything to offer to India nor did they press India to mediate.
Israel has stood like a lion despite being in a position of disadvantage and managed to secure it’s position in the UN. I would also like to point out to Sh. Gopal Krishna Gandhi that Modi has been fair to skip Palestine as not meeting is not the same as meeting and rubbing their nose into the fact that nothing can be done and for that matter nobody would help you (maybe apart from our pray for Gaza candle light brigade).
The love of liberals for Palestine appears to stem from either the fact that they consider arabs to be racially superior or their love for the petro-dollars which makes a back door entry into their itchy hands. The liberals have never cared about the next door Pashtoons and the Balochs who are not only poor but face worse atrocities at the hands of the Pakistan army. One knows why but must at least pretend to wonder for the benefit of these “scholars”.
The attacks on Israel by the Palestinians have been a continuous barrage which have been thwarted and replied to in their own currency. This is what scares the left leaning, minority appeasing, Nehruvian ideology followers. If India starts replying to it’s aggressors in their own currency, the unruly neighbours would be in for a rude shock and this is exactly what they do not want as they wish to project India as a meek and moot spectator to the frequent border hostilities. The positioning in the modern times is based on being in a position of geological advantage with sophisticated weaponry. The adage that holds true is “peace means having a bigger stick than the other guy.”
Country maintains the responsibility to protect it’s citizens from threats and respond to them appropriately and Israel believes in it like the post Modi India. An attack on it’s citizens is not only an attack on an individual but also on the sovereignty and hence should be responded to aptly. Israel is an example and India should follow.
The preparedness to go on an offensive to neuter the enemies is a foreign concept to the Nehruvian ideologists. The losses in Kashmir are a standing example of that. Pandering to the enemies has for long been a forte of the same ideologists, a recent example was the meeting of a “young” leader with the Chinese embassy even as the border skirmishes are increasing but one can question the PM and his advisors but the “young” prince should remain indubitable.
Self deception: India’s China policies by Arun Shourie