A shocking twist has emerged in the case of an alleged acid attack in Delhi that initially caused widespread outrage across the country. What appeared to be a brutal act of gender-based violence has now turned into a case of deliberate fabrication and deception. Police investigations have revealed that the 20-year-old college student, who claimed to have been attacked with acid, had staged the entire incident under the direction of her father, Aqeel Khan. The “acid,” as it turns out, was a toilet cleaner that the woman had poured on her own hands to simulate injuries.
The Claim That Sparked Outrage
The case began on a Sunday morning when a second-year B.Com student enrolled in Delhi University’s Non-Collegiate Women’s Education Board claimed that she was attacked near Laxmi Bai College in the national capital. According to her statement, a man named Jitendra an acquaintance she accused of stalking her along with two friends, Ishan and Arman, approached her on a motorcycle. She alleged that one of them threw acid on her as she tried to protect her face, resulting in burn injuries on her hands.
The woman’s allegations were detailed and emotional. She told police that Jitendra had been harassing her for several weeks and that a confrontation between them had occurred a month earlier. Following the complaint, the Delhi Police registered a case and began tracking down the alleged attackers. The incident triggered public anger and sympathy, with many calling for stronger laws against acid attacks and stalking.
However, within 24 hours of the report, the police began to find serious discrepancies in the woman’s story. What began as an apparent case of violence against women was soon exposed as a calculated act of manipulation.
Police Investigation Reveals Contradictions
Investigators quickly noticed inconsistencies between the woman’s claims and the available evidence. CCTV footage from the area showed no sign of the alleged attackers at the time of the incident. The footage instead showed the woman leaving home on a scooter driven by her brother, who dropped her 200 metres away from her college in Ashok Vihar. She was then seen taking an e-rickshaw toward the college contradicting her claim that the attack took place right outside the college gate.
Police also found that Jitendra, the main accused, was nowhere near the alleged crime scene. His mobile phone location and CCTV footage placed him in Karol Bagh, several kilometres away, during the time of the incident. The motorcycle mentioned in the complaint was also found parked in Karol Bagh. Moreover, forensic teams discovered no traces of acid at the scene no burn marks on nearby walls or on the ground, as would normally be expected in such attacks.
When confronted with this evidence, the woman’s story began to collapse. Police summoned her for further questioning and started investigating possible motives behind the false claim. That’s when the case took a darker and more complicated turn involving her father, Aqeel Khan.
Father’s Confession and Hidden Motives
In a dramatic twist, Delhi Police arrested Aqeel Khan, the woman’s father, who had gone into hiding shortly after the alleged attack. Upon interrogation, Khan admitted that the acid attack was staged. He revealed that the burns on his daughter’s hands were caused by toilet cleaner she had carried from home. The chemical was not acid but a household cleaning agent, confirming forensic suspicions.
According to Khan’s confession, the entire plan was conceived to falsely implicate Jitendra and his family. Khan allegedly wanted to take revenge against Jitendra’s wife, who had earlier filed a rape and harassment complaint against him. Police records show that the woman worked in Khan’s factory between 2021 and 2024 and had accused him of sexually assaulting her, blackmailing her with objectionable photos, and threatening her repeatedly. Following her complaint, an FIR was filed under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the IT Act.
Khan, who was arrested in connection with the rape case, reportedly admitted that he fabricated the acid attack story to shift the focus away from the allegations against him and to frame the complainant’s husband and his brothers. “The woman was carrying the toilet cleaner from home, which she poured on her hands herself,” a senior police officer quoted him as saying.
Web of Rivalries and Past Disputes
The case has exposed a tangled web of old rivalries and family disputes. The two other accused in the alleged acid attack, brothers Arman and Ishan, are currently in Agra with their mother, Shabnam. She told police that her family had long been at odds with Khan and that she herself was attacked with acid by Khan’s relatives in 2018. That case, too, is currently under trial.
Police believe that the alleged acid attack story was part of a long-standing feud involving property disputes and personal animosity. “The father not only framed innocent people but used his daughter as a pawn in his revenge plan,” an officer said. Investigators are also examining why the woman’s brother who dropped her near the scene has been avoiding interrogation.
As the truth emerged, Delhi Police moved to file legal proceedings against both the woman and her father for misleading authorities and fabricating a criminal case. Officials have stated that appropriate sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita will be invoked for filing a false complaint, obstructing justice, and causing public alarm through deceit.
A Case That Exposes the Dangers of False Narratives
The Delhi “acid attack” case has turned into a cautionary example of how false claims can spread rapidly, distort facts, and divert public sympathy from genuine victims. Within hours of the initial report, social media outrage and media coverage painted a picture of a violent crime against a young woman. Yet, careful investigation and forensic work revealed a staged event one rooted in revenge and manipulation.
Beyond the immediate legal consequences for those involved, the case raises broader questions about accountability, ethics, and media responsibility. False cases like these not only waste investigative resources but also undermine the credibility of real survivors of violence, who often struggle to be believed.
For Delhi Police, the case is both a vindication of careful forensic inquiry and a reminder of how easily misinformation can inflame public emotion. For society, it serves as a warning that truth must always be tested by evidence not assumed from outrage.
