A recent article from the Financial Times has brought to light a concerning incident involving the United States and India. According to the report, US authorities managed to thwart a plot aimed at assassinating Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, a prominent Sikh separatist leader who holds citizenship in both the US and Canada. This plot is suspected to have roots in the Indian government, a claim that has understandably strained relations between the two countries.
Gurpatwant Singh Pannun is not just any individual; he is the general counsel for Sikhs for Justice, a US-based terror organization actively advocating for a separate Sikh state, Khalistan. This group’s activities and Pannun’s role have evidently made him a target, leading to the so called alarming assassination plot that the US authorities have allegedly intercepted.
Also Read: Sikh terror organisation invites Kashmir’s Islamic terrorists to sabotage India’s Republic Day
The details surrounding the foiling of this plot, however, remain unclear. The sources familiar with the case have not specified whether the intervention was a result of the US’s protest to New Delhi or if it was the FBI’s direct involvement that disrupted the plotters’ scheme. This ambiguity leaves room for speculation about the extent of the plot and the nature of the actions taken by both the US and Indian authorities.
It’s also noteworthy that the US’s warning to India came after a significant diplomatic event – Indian PM Narendra Modi’s visit to Washington in June.
Adrienne Watson, a spokesperson for the NSC, conveyed that the issue had been raised with New Delhi at the highest levels, signalling a significant diplomatic concern.
In a related turn of events, Washington has reportedly shared details of the Pannun case with a broader group of allies. This dissemination of information followed Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s public disclosure of the Vancouver killing. Notably, India has vehemently denied Canada’s accusations of involvement in the murder of Nijjar, calling them “absurd.”
>>>Click the link to Join Our WhatsApp Channel<<<
The External Affairs Ministry of India, responding to the FT’s report, mentioned that in recent India-US security talks, the US shared intelligence about connections between organized criminals, gun runners, terrorists, and other nefarious elements.
Pannun himself, approached by the Financial Times, chose not to disclose whether US authorities had informed him about the threat to his life. His statement to the FT was pointed, deferring the responsibility of addressing this issue to the US government. He emphasized that it was up to them to respond to threats to his life on American soil, purportedly from Indian operatives.
The White House further revealed that the Indian government expressed both surprise and concern when the US raised the issue with them. Indian officials asserted that “activity of this nature was not policy,” distancing the government from any involvement in such plots.
Right! The recent developments regarding Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, are clear but they also raise a multitude of questions that demand answers, not just from the US but on a global scale, particularly from the perspective of the Global South.
First and foremost, there’s a pressing question regarding why the US is providing shelter to an individual designated as a terrorist by India. This situation draws parallels with notorious figures like Baghdadi or Bin Laden. Would the US have reacted similarly if India had hosted such individuals? This comparison underscores a perceived double standard in international politics, where the rules seem to differ based on the country involved.
Then there’s the issue of Sikhs for Justice, the organization Pannun is associated with. This group, advocating for an independent Sikh state, is operating from within the US. Why is such an organization, perceived by India as a threat to its territorial integrity, allowed to function on American soil? This situation raises questions about the US’s stance on separatist movements globally.
The US government’s high-level involvement in Pannun’s case is also puzzling. Why is there such significant concern for an individual like Pannun? Is there more to his story, perhaps connections with the CIA, as speculated in some circles? Such speculation isn’t new in international relations, where covert operations have historically played roles in shaping geopolitics.
Moreover, the connection between the Khalistan movement and Pakistan’s ISI is often discussed. This raises suspicions about the US’s intentions. Is the US collaborating with Pakistan to destabilize India, a country that is now a significant global player, leading movements like dedollarization, heading BRICS, and showcasing rapid economic growth?
Pannun’s recent video message threatening Indian officials and advising Sikhs against flying Air India due to life-threatening risks is alarming. Does this imply that the US supports such threats, given their protection of Pannun? This situation puts the US’s stance on international terrorism and its commitment to global security under scrutiny.
Lastly, the validity of the claims made by both Trudeau and the US needs to be examined. Trudeau, who made allegations about New Delhi’s involvement in a murder in Vancouver, reportedly didn’t provide concrete evidence. Similarly, what evidence does the US hold to support its claims about the assassination plot? This lack of transparent proof is a matter of concern for international relations and justice.
Biden is too old to rule and he has only few months in office. It would be wise of him to not stir up the Indian Hornet’s nest. That specie is particularly stingy.
Support TFI:
Support us to strengthen the ‘Right’ ideology of cultural nationalism by purchasing the best quality garments from TFI-STORE.COM
