The Supreme Court of India, often seen to uphold the ultimate freedom of expression and liberty of its ‘peaceful’ subjects has said that Nupur Sharma’s ‘loose tongue’ has caused the beheading of Kanhaiyalal in Udaipur. Hearing a plea filed by Nupur Sharma to club the multiple FIRs registered against her, Supreme Court further said that “what is the business of the TV channel to discuss the matter which is sub-judice, except to promote an agenda?”
"What is the business of the TV channel to discuss the matter which is sub-judice, except to promote an agenda?", Supreme Court says while hearing Nupur Sharma's plea to club FIRs over remarks on Prophet Muhammed.#NupurSharma #SupremeCourt pic.twitter.com/S4qFNfQGZW
— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) July 1, 2022
Two lines have become a security threat to the nation?
According to the report, Nupur Sharma moved the Supreme Court seeking the transfer of all FIRs across states over her controversial remark to Delhi as she is facing life threats from Islamists. The Supreme Court observed that she has “threatened the security of the nation”.
Supreme Court is hearing the plea of suspended BJP leader Nupur Sharma seeking transfer of all the FIRs registered against her in many states for alleged remarks on Prophet, to Delhi for investigation.
Supreme Court says she has "threatened the security of the nation".
— ANI (@ANI) July 1, 2022
Blaming Nupur Sharma for Udaipur’s murder, the Supreme Court said “she should apologize to the whole country. She and her loose tongue have set the entire country on fire. Her outburst is responsible for the unfortunate incident at Udaipur, where a tailor was murdered.”
Supreme Court slams Nupur Sharma and says she should apologise to the whole country. Supreme Court says she and her loose tongue has set the entire country on fire. Supreme Court says her outburst is responsible for the unfortunate incident at Udaipur, where a tailor was murdered
— ANI (@ANI) July 1, 2022
When senior advocate Maninder Singh appearing for Nupur Sharma tells the Supreme Court that she has apologized for the remarks and withdrew the comments, the Court said, “She should have gone to the TV and apologized to the nation. She was too late to apologize and withdrew the statement. She withdrew the statement conditionally, saying if sentiments hurt”.
"She was too late to withdraw…and too she withdraws conditionally, saying if sentiments hurt", Supreme Court says on #NupurSharma comments.#SupremeCourt
— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) July 1, 2022
When her advocate informed the court that she has a threat to her life, Justice Surya Kant said, “She has a threat or she has become a security threat? The way she has ignited emotions across the country, she is single-handedly responsible for what is happening in the country”.
As Nupur Sharma's advocate tells Supreme Court that she has threat to her life, Justice Surya Kant says she has threat or she has become a security threat? The way she has ignited emotions across the country, she is single-handedly responsible for what is happening in the country
— ANI (@ANI) July 1, 2022
Also Read: Nupur Sharma is responsible for the attacks on Kabul Gurudwara. Next joke please
In a way, the Supreme Court of India, the ultimate defender of the ‘secular’ republic, is saying that two lines by a lady are sufficient to endanger 100 crore lives. The observation of the Court is very intriguing from the fact that when Islamists are openly giving beheading threats to her, the court is making such justifying statements. Further, the Court’s statement will be used as a justification in Kanhaiya Lal’s murder case.
Support TFI:
Support us to strengthen the ‘Right’ ideology of cultural nationalism by purchasing the best quality garments from TFI-STORE.COM
Also Watch:
