From “Oppressed Minority” to “The Kashmir Files is responsible”, A ready list of the most ridiculous excuses used to justify the Kashmir genocide

How low do you think can a liberal stoop to? Well, they can go beyond the extent to demean their country and defend the terrorists. In such a move, they resort to excuses upon excuses to justify the terror activities that claim multiple lives. Now, the left-liberal cabal has come up with yet another shameful attempt to justify the targeted killing of one Rahul Bhatt in Kashmir.

Targeted killing of a Kashmiri Pandit

Rahul Bhat, a Kashmiri Pandit government employee died while being rushed to the hospital after terrorists fired at him inside the Tehsil office in Chadoora town. The terrorist group named ‘Kashmir Tigers’ has taken responsibility for the attack. Rahul was appointed as a clerk under the special employment package for migrants in 2010-11.

His wife, however, says that “some people within his office conspired with the terrorists”.

In the aftermath of a Kashmiri Pandit’s targeted killing, government employees and families of Kashmiri Pandits staged a protest against the administration. However, a video shot at the protest site displays the police firing tear gas shells at them with a motive to silence their voice and prevent them from moving towards the Airport Road.

Rahul Bhat killed due to a film

Soon after Rahul was killed by terrorists, the liberal cabal instead of condemning terrorism and criticising the terrorists, stepped in with its hate politics to turn his tragic death into an opportunity to slam a film. The liberal lobby began accusing the film titled ‘The Kashmir Files’ which had exposed earlier the Islamic brutality and how it led to Kashmiri Pandit’s genocide in the 1990s.

Ashish Kumar Singh, a journalist from ABP news, shamefully tweeted, “Whether one believes or not, an irresponsible film ruined everything.”

Another journalist tweeted, “Those who were celebrating a movie should today also celebrate it’s fallout.”

In retaliation to the people’s accusation that the film is dividing the country, the lead actor of the film Anupam Kher said, “You have tried to heal their wounds after watching this film. The film was appreciated not only in India but all over the world. There was a big slap on the face of all those people who had kept the trade of Kashmiri Hindus as a lie for 32 years till date.”

Read More: Mass resignation by Kashmiri Pandits shows that just abrogating Article 370 is not enough

He further added, “But on 12th the militants killed a Kashmiri Hindu named Rahul Bhatt..Jihadis today..Now what will those people who were saying for 2-3 days that the film is banned in the country ..what a big lie. Those who used this film in the name of propaganda or the current government praised it.. What would they say.. Watching this film, you have tried to heal the wounds of all these Kashmiri Pandits.”

Muslims are oppressed thus they picked up guns

In an old video, a young Barkha Dutt, a left-leaning journalist, can be seen as attempting to justify what the radical terrorists had done in the 1990s. Barkha had stated, “Today hapless victims, they (Kashmiri Hindus) were once the privileged elite of the valley. They may have been a minority but at that time, they had monopolized government jobs, plum postings and other such social benefits. In fact, the sharp economic disparity between the poor pandits and the poor Muslim majority was one of the earliest reasons for popular discontent in the state.”

You see, how shamefully Barkha Dutt defended what transpired in Kashmir and how poorly did she justify the genocide of Kashmiri Pandits in the valley.

Terrorists picked up guns as armed forces mistreated them

Arundhati Roy, whose Booker Prize has only been able to take her to the office of some left-leaning portals, had also once attempted to whitewash the terrorism in the valley. In an interview, she had stated, “I want to say quite unambiguously that I do not think that any country that calls itself a democracy has the right to force people to remain with you in the militaristic way, the way India is doing to prove that it’s a secular country. It is brutalising Kashmir and this does not prove secularism in any way.”

Arundhati, however, forgot to mention terrorists’ brutal attacks on Kashmiri Pandits. Well, what else can be expected from an anti-India liberal?

Moreover, Bollywood’s attempts to whitewash the crimes committed by terrorists are not a new phenomenon. The ‘Urduwood’ industry has been trying to humanise the Islamists by peddling their selfish agenda.

The movie ‘Haider’, a brainchild by Basharat Peer, cleverly depicted that the armed force’s mistreatment led a few Kashmiris to become terrorists. Interestingly, a Kashmiri youth named Saqib Bilal Sheikh, who was featured by Bollywood director Vishal Bharadwaj in his propaganda movie “Haider”, turned out to be a terrorist in real life.

Terrorists picked up guns as they are uneducated

“With guns you can kill terrorists, With education you can kill terrorism.” This is what Malala Yousafzai stated for her so-called activism. The liberals have been claiming for years that the lack of education leads someone to become a terrorist. How cute, right?

What is the message behind such a statement? What are the liberals trying to prove? As per the liberals, anyone who is uneducated should become a terrorist. If this logic is something to go by, any individual selling street food or driving an autorickshaw must quit their job to become a terrorist.

You see, the liberals can go beyond the extent to defend anything that is against the interest of the nation. Thus, these excuses don’t come as a surprise.