Delhi Court sends Islamoleftists into mourning over Sharjeel Imam case

Islamoleftists’ attempt to garner media headlines by creating disharmony in India’s populace has been dealt a severe blow by the country’s judiciary. Sharjeel Imam, one of the poster boys of liberal media is to languish in jail for a much longer time than he ever expected.

Court denies bail to Sharjeel Imam

A session court in Delhi has dismissed the bail plea of one of the key pillars of ‘tukde-tukde gang,’ Sharjeel Imam. Additional session judge, Anuj Agarwal confirmed the negative effect of Sharjeel’s speech on the communal harmony of the country. “A cursory and plain reading of the speech dated 13.12.2019 reveals that same is clearly on communal/divisive lines. In my view, the tone and tenor of the incendiary speech tend to have a debilitating effect upon public tranquility, peace, and harmony of the society,” the Court said.

Rights, rights and rights; but where are your responsibilities?

The court’s pronouncements also gave an insight into liberals’ illogical insistence on rights without playing any responsible role in society. Honourable Judge noted that everyone has the fundamental right to speak under Article 19 of the constitution. However, mentioning fundamental duties under Article 51A, the court said that freedom of speech and expression cannot be exercised at the cost of communal peace and harmony in the society.

After considering both prosecution’s and defence’s views, the court denied him bail for the charges of sedition and promoting enmity among religious groups. Denying the bail, the court also quoted Swami Vivekanand, “We are what our thoughts have made us; so take care about what you think. Words are secondary. Thoughts live; they travel far.”

Liberals love for the tukde-tukde gang resurfaces

Meanwhile, as the news of Sharjeel’s bail surfaced, the liberals’ meltdown started on various social media platforms.

A wannabe politician (probably) and a Radio Jockey, RJ Sayema of Radio Mirchi was quick to present her half-researched views on Twitter regarding the case. Forgetting, or possibly ignoring Sharjeel’s speech in which he advocated for dividing northeast from India, she castigated law enforcement agencies for keeping him in jail, because, according to her, he only spoke on ‘chakka jam’.

Kavita Krishna, a well-known CPIML politburo member, was found running a charity for Sharjeel and co-conspirators on social media.

She accused the well-trained judge of contradicting himself for denying the bail to Sharjeel.

The communist feminist also looked puzzled about the hierarchy of the court system in India and misinformed social media about no oversight on the lower courts by the Supreme Court.

Apparently, the author also managed to draw a hypothetical link between Aryan Khan’s case and that of Sharjeel Imam’s.

She also retweeted one of the tweets of a journalist, who accused the independent court of being ‘remote-controlled’.

Indira Jaisingh, a veteran lawyer who attempted to ‘inform’ Indian judges on the definition of national and anti-national said that the bail denial can be appealed. However, she did not seem to agree with the court’s insistence on denying the bail to Sharjeel.

A Twitterati @Fatima_Z0hra hilariously opined that Sharjeel and his JNU colleagues are alone and accused that the government is trying to please the majority by putting him in Jail.

Sharjeel-A Jinnah in the making if not controlled

As reported by the TFI, Sharjeel Imam was one of the masterminds behind anti-CAA protests and riots in the country. He was trying to establish an Islamic state in India and had no qualms in breaking the geographical integrity of Bharat. Once he had urged his brethren to cut off north-eastern states from India. Despite his anti-national remarks, Sharjeel is widely supported by the left-liberal media like NDTV and The Wire, who call him and many others like him activists.

Read more: Sharjeel was just the puppet. The Puppeteer was BadruddinAjmal. And his sinister anti-India plan is exposed

It is ironic that the same people who speak of problems faced by Rohingyas and other illegal immigrants have no qualms in forcing Indians into the same rabbit hole. While, the horrors of partition are still afresh in the minds of many Indians, any attempt to break India should not be tolerated by anyone. The court’s decision should be a lesson for the people who are working hard to break the sovereignty and integrity of India.