• About us
  • Careers
  • Brand Partnerships
TFI Official Merchandise
TFI हिन्दी
TFI Global
Sunday, April 2, 2023
Tfipost.com
  • Premium
  • Politics
    • All
    • Analysis
    • Opinions
    • Trending
    Digvijay is not Congress; Congress leaders are not Congress; then who represents Congress? convicted Rahul Gandhi?

    Digvijay is not Congress; Congress leaders are not Congress; then who represents Congress? convicted Rahul Gandhi?

    Bhutan PM statement

    Bhutan’s unfortunate statement on Doklam stalemate

    The cat and mouse game between the Indian government and Zakir Naik, and why Naik is winning

    The cat and mouse game between the Indian government and Zakir Naik, and why Naik is winning

    Mamata Banerjee petition

    Bombay HC castigates Mamata Banerjee for being unpatriotic

    • Analysis
    • Opinions
    • Trending
  • Economy
    • All
    • Business
    • Economy1
    • Finance
    overall exports of India

    India’s overall exports crossed $750 billion

    UPI interchange fee

    UPI interchange fee: NPCI levies transaction charge, who will pay?

    Chinese FDI

    Nirmala Sitaraman takes out her club to break Chinese investors backbone

    Campa Cola

    Reliance’s foray into Indian Soft Drinks: Can Campa Cola make a comeback?

    • Business
    • Finance
  • Defense
    • All
    • Defence
    • Strategy
    • Weaponry
    Khalistan – Pakistan’s only successful project against India

    Khalistan – Pakistan’s only successful project against India

    Defence Ministry to boost IAF’s capabilities

    Defence Ministry to boost IAF’s capabilities

    ASEAN’s Defence Market: India and South Korea Compete for Supremacy

    ASEAN’s Defence Market: India and South Korea Compete for Supremacy

    From Pipeline to Power Grid: India and Bangladesh Forge Stronger Energy Bonds

    From Pipeline to Power Grid: India and Bangladesh Forge Stronger Energy Bonds

    • Defence
    • Strategy
    • Weaponry
  • Geopolitics
    • All
    • Africa
    • Americas
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • South Asia
    • West Asia
    Bhutan PM statement

    Bhutan’s unfortunate statement on Doklam stalemate

    The cat and mouse game between the Indian government and Zakir Naik, and why Naik is winning

    The cat and mouse game between the Indian government and Zakir Naik, and why Naik is winning

    Saudi Arabia Pakistan loans

    No more interest-free loans: Saudi Arabia and Kuwait humiliate Pakistan

    AFINDEX-2023

    AFINDEX-2023: The Defence Ministry’s Outreach to African Nations, A Closer Look

    • Africa
    • Americas
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • South Asia
    • West Asia
  • Knowledge
    • All
    • Culture
    • History
    • Indology
    Balochistan India

    Nehru’s Historic Blunder: Why Balochistan Remains Disconnected from India

    Raghunath Rao

    Raghunath Rao vs Peshwa Madhavrao: The Mahabharata that could’ve been avoided

    Merger of Jodhpur

    A Narrow Miss: When Jodhpur Nearly Became Part of Pakistan

    Yes, Akbar was more Naseeruddin Shah and not even one bit of Hrithik Roshan

    Yes, Akbar was more Naseeruddin Shah and not even one bit of Hrithik Roshan

    • Culture
    • History
    • Indology
  • Law
  • Lounge
    • All
    • Books
    • Cinema
    • Food
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Satire
    • Sports
    • technology
    • Travel
    Bholaa movie review

    ‘Bholaa’ movie : True Review

    Siddharth Roy Kapur Bollywood

    Siddharth Roy Kapur has predicted the future of Bollywood and it makes a lot of sense

    EV Charging Stations

    India’s Push for Electric Vehicles: Boosting Infrastructure with 7,432 Charging Stations

    Top 10 Strangest Lakes in the World

    The Enigmatic Wonders: Top 10 Strangest Lakes in the World

    • Books
    • Cinema
    • Food
    • Health
    • Sports
    • technology
    • Travel
    • Satire
No Result
View All Result
Tfipost.com
  • Premium
  • Politics
    • All
    • Analysis
    • Opinions
    • Trending
    Digvijay is not Congress; Congress leaders are not Congress; then who represents Congress? convicted Rahul Gandhi?

    Digvijay is not Congress; Congress leaders are not Congress; then who represents Congress? convicted Rahul Gandhi?

    Bhutan PM statement

    Bhutan’s unfortunate statement on Doklam stalemate

    The cat and mouse game between the Indian government and Zakir Naik, and why Naik is winning

    The cat and mouse game between the Indian government and Zakir Naik, and why Naik is winning

    Mamata Banerjee petition

    Bombay HC castigates Mamata Banerjee for being unpatriotic

    • Analysis
    • Opinions
    • Trending
  • Economy
    • All
    • Business
    • Economy1
    • Finance
    overall exports of India

    India’s overall exports crossed $750 billion

    UPI interchange fee

    UPI interchange fee: NPCI levies transaction charge, who will pay?

    Chinese FDI

    Nirmala Sitaraman takes out her club to break Chinese investors backbone

    Campa Cola

    Reliance’s foray into Indian Soft Drinks: Can Campa Cola make a comeback?

    • Business
    • Finance
  • Defense
    • All
    • Defence
    • Strategy
    • Weaponry
    Khalistan – Pakistan’s only successful project against India

    Khalistan – Pakistan’s only successful project against India

    Defence Ministry to boost IAF’s capabilities

    Defence Ministry to boost IAF’s capabilities

    ASEAN’s Defence Market: India and South Korea Compete for Supremacy

    ASEAN’s Defence Market: India and South Korea Compete for Supremacy

    From Pipeline to Power Grid: India and Bangladesh Forge Stronger Energy Bonds

    From Pipeline to Power Grid: India and Bangladesh Forge Stronger Energy Bonds

    • Defence
    • Strategy
    • Weaponry
  • Geopolitics
    • All
    • Africa
    • Americas
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • South Asia
    • West Asia
    Bhutan PM statement

    Bhutan’s unfortunate statement on Doklam stalemate

    The cat and mouse game between the Indian government and Zakir Naik, and why Naik is winning

    The cat and mouse game between the Indian government and Zakir Naik, and why Naik is winning

    Saudi Arabia Pakistan loans

    No more interest-free loans: Saudi Arabia and Kuwait humiliate Pakistan

    AFINDEX-2023

    AFINDEX-2023: The Defence Ministry’s Outreach to African Nations, A Closer Look

    • Africa
    • Americas
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • South Asia
    • West Asia
  • Knowledge
    • All
    • Culture
    • History
    • Indology
    Balochistan India

    Nehru’s Historic Blunder: Why Balochistan Remains Disconnected from India

    Raghunath Rao

    Raghunath Rao vs Peshwa Madhavrao: The Mahabharata that could’ve been avoided

    Merger of Jodhpur

    A Narrow Miss: When Jodhpur Nearly Became Part of Pakistan

    Yes, Akbar was more Naseeruddin Shah and not even one bit of Hrithik Roshan

    Yes, Akbar was more Naseeruddin Shah and not even one bit of Hrithik Roshan

    • Culture
    • History
    • Indology
  • Law
  • Lounge
    • All
    • Books
    • Cinema
    • Food
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Satire
    • Sports
    • technology
    • Travel
    Bholaa movie review

    ‘Bholaa’ movie : True Review

    Siddharth Roy Kapur Bollywood

    Siddharth Roy Kapur has predicted the future of Bollywood and it makes a lot of sense

    EV Charging Stations

    India’s Push for Electric Vehicles: Boosting Infrastructure with 7,432 Charging Stations

    Top 10 Strangest Lakes in the World

    The Enigmatic Wonders: Top 10 Strangest Lakes in the World

    • Books
    • Cinema
    • Food
    • Health
    • Sports
    • technology
    • Travel
    • Satire
No Result
View All Result
Tfipost.com
No Result
View All Result

HOME » Politics » Opinions » Story of a Startup!

Story of a Startup!

Atul Kumar Mishra
by Atul Kumar Mishra
3 February 2014
in Opinions
0
21
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
He was a smart developer. He teamed up with his smart MBA friend and couple of other IT guys to create a trailblazing product in the e-commerce domain. They planned to launch the portal on 1st of January 2014. Even before their release, they created a lot of buzz in the market, although analysts doubted their success. Some even wrote them off. The start-up started well and got a lot of investors interested but soon it began losing its momentum. They started committing goof ups everyday. The goof ups soon turned into blunders. Investors started getting pissed and some even threatened to cancel the funding. Meanwhile lot of founding members quit as they weren’t happy with the way the start-up was going. 

The MBA guy who led the entire operation started smelling foul play and began wailing. He complained that the current market leaders are trying to topple his start-up. The smart developer even said that one of the current market leaders in the e-commerce domain called him on 31st of December 2013 and tried to hire him at fat pay package so that the new start-up gets toppled. However he refused and went ahead with the start-up. The MBA chap has now stopped working and is planning to do a protest outside the residence of the market leader’s COO. The investors are even more pissed. The old loyal subscribers of the market leader are having a good laugh about the new start-up and its weird strategies. The new subscribers of the start-up are confused, some have switched loyalties already.

 

I tried analyzing the scenario. This fails on a number of points:

 

  1. No market leader offers to topple a new start-up unless the latter is proved as a competition to it
  2. There should be proofs to justify that there have been unfair advances by the competitors
  3. One shouldn’t go to the public domain without facts and/or justifications
  4. Competition should always be in the priority list but work should always top that list
  5. Disgust should be expressed by a constitutional channel or through a regulatory authority
  6. Strategy should keep evolving or else the subscribers get bored
  7. Competitors should stay away from mudslinging as it defames the entire domain
  8. The core agenda of a company should always remain intact
  9. The investors and their interests should always be respected
  10. The company should strive to increase its subscriber base and not lose the existing subscriber base

 

Picture Courtesy: – www.startupplays.com

He was a smart developer. He teamed up with his smart MBA friend and couple of other IT guys to create a trailblazing product in the e-commerce domain. They planned to launch the portal on 1st of January 2014. Even before their release, they created a lot of buzz in the market, although analysts doubted their success. Some even wrote them off. The start-up started well and got a lot of investors interested but soon it began losing its momentum. They started committing goof ups everyday. The goof ups soon turned into blunders. Investors started getting pissed and some even threatened to cancel the funding. Meanwhile lot of founding members quit as they weren’t happy with the way the start-up was going. 

The MBA guy who led the entire operation started smelling foul play and began wailing. He complained that the current market leaders are trying to topple his start-up. The smart developer even said that one of the current market leaders in the e-commerce domain called him on 31st of December 2013 and tried to hire him at fat pay package so that the new start-up gets toppled. However he refused and went ahead with the start-up. The MBA chap has now stopped working and is planning to do a protest outside the residence of the market leader’s COO. The investors are even more pissed. The old loyal subscribers of the market leader are having a good laugh about the new start-up and its weird strategies. The new subscribers of the start-up are confused, some have switched loyalties already.

 

I tried analyzing the scenario. This fails on a number of points:

 

  1. No market leader offers to topple a new start-up unless the latter is proved as a competition to it
  2. There should be proofs to justify that there have been unfair advances by the competitors
  3. One shouldn’t go to the public domain without facts and/or justifications
  4. Competition should always be in the priority list but work should always top that list
  5. Disgust should be expressed by a constitutional channel or through a regulatory authority
  6. Strategy should keep evolving or else the subscribers get bored
  7. Competitors should stay away from mudslinging as it defames the entire domain
  8. The core agenda of a company should always remain intact
  9. The investors and their interests should always be respected
  10. The company should strive to increase its subscriber base and not lose the existing subscriber base

 

Picture Courtesy: – www.startupplays.com

He was a smart developer. He teamed up with his smart MBA friend and couple of other IT guys to create a trailblazing product in the e-commerce domain. They planned to launch the portal on 1st of January 2014. Even before their release, they created a lot of buzz in the market, although analysts doubted their success. Some even wrote them off. The start-up started well and got a lot of investors interested but soon it began losing its momentum. They started committing goof ups everyday. The goof ups soon turned into blunders. Investors started getting pissed and some even threatened to cancel the funding. Meanwhile lot of founding members quit as they weren’t happy with the way the start-up was going. 

The MBA guy who led the entire operation started smelling foul play and began wailing. He complained that the current market leaders are trying to topple his start-up. The smart developer even said that one of the current market leaders in the e-commerce domain called him on 31st of December 2013 and tried to hire him at fat pay package so that the new start-up gets toppled. However he refused and went ahead with the start-up. The MBA chap has now stopped working and is planning to do a protest outside the residence of the market leader’s COO. The investors are even more pissed. The old loyal subscribers of the market leader are having a good laugh about the new start-up and its weird strategies. The new subscribers of the start-up are confused, some have switched loyalties already.

 

I tried analyzing the scenario. This fails on a number of points:

 

  1. No market leader offers to topple a new start-up unless the latter is proved as a competition to it
  2. There should be proofs to justify that there have been unfair advances by the competitors
  3. One shouldn’t go to the public domain without facts and/or justifications
  4. Competition should always be in the priority list but work should always top that list
  5. Disgust should be expressed by a constitutional channel or through a regulatory authority
  6. Strategy should keep evolving or else the subscribers get bored
  7. Competitors should stay away from mudslinging as it defames the entire domain
  8. The core agenda of a company should always remain intact
  9. The investors and their interests should always be respected
  10. The company should strive to increase its subscriber base and not lose the existing subscriber base

 

Picture Courtesy: – www.startupplays.com

He was a smart developer. He teamed up with his smart MBA friend and couple of other IT guys to create a trailblazing product in the e-commerce domain. They planned to launch the portal on 1st of January 2014. Even before their release, they created a lot of buzz in the market, although analysts doubted their success. Some even wrote them off. The start-up started well and got a lot of investors interested but soon it began losing its momentum. They started committing goof ups everyday. The goof ups soon turned into blunders. Investors started getting pissed and some even threatened to cancel the funding. Meanwhile lot of founding members quit as they weren’t happy with the way the start-up was going. 

The MBA guy who led the entire operation started smelling foul play and began wailing. He complained that the current market leaders are trying to topple his start-up. The smart developer even said that one of the current market leaders in the e-commerce domain called him on 31st of December 2013 and tried to hire him at fat pay package so that the new start-up gets toppled. However he refused and went ahead with the start-up. The MBA chap has now stopped working and is planning to do a protest outside the residence of the market leader’s COO. The investors are even more pissed. The old loyal subscribers of the market leader are having a good laugh about the new start-up and its weird strategies. The new subscribers of the start-up are confused, some have switched loyalties already.

 

I tried analyzing the scenario. This fails on a number of points:

 

  1. No market leader offers to topple a new start-up unless the latter is proved as a competition to it
  2. There should be proofs to justify that there have been unfair advances by the competitors
  3. One shouldn’t go to the public domain without facts and/or justifications
  4. Competition should always be in the priority list but work should always top that list
  5. Disgust should be expressed by a constitutional channel or through a regulatory authority
  6. Strategy should keep evolving or else the subscribers get bored
  7. Competitors should stay away from mudslinging as it defames the entire domain
  8. The core agenda of a company should always remain intact
  9. The investors and their interests should always be respected
  10. The company should strive to increase its subscriber base and not lose the existing subscriber base

 

Picture Courtesy: – www.startupplays.com

He was a smart developer. He teamed up with his smart MBA friend and couple of other IT guys to create a trailblazing product in the e-commerce domain. They planned to launch the portal on 1st of January 2014. Even before their release, they created a lot of buzz in the market, although analysts doubted their success. Some even wrote them off. The start-up started well and got a lot of investors interested but soon it began losing its momentum. They started committing goof ups everyday. The goof ups soon turned into blunders. Investors started getting pissed and some even threatened to cancel the funding. Meanwhile lot of founding members quit as they weren’t happy with the way the start-up was going. 

The MBA guy who led the entire operation started smelling foul play and began wailing. He complained that the current market leaders are trying to topple his start-up. The smart developer even said that one of the current market leaders in the e-commerce domain called him on 31st of December 2013 and tried to hire him at fat pay package so that the new start-up gets toppled. However he refused and went ahead with the start-up. The MBA chap has now stopped working and is planning to do a protest outside the residence of the market leader’s COO. The investors are even more pissed. The old loyal subscribers of the market leader are having a good laugh about the new start-up and its weird strategies. The new subscribers of the start-up are confused, some have switched loyalties already.

 

I tried analyzing the scenario. This fails on a number of points:

 

  1. No market leader offers to topple a new start-up unless the latter is proved as a competition to it
  2. There should be proofs to justify that there have been unfair advances by the competitors
  3. One shouldn’t go to the public domain without facts and/or justifications
  4. Competition should always be in the priority list but work should always top that list
  5. Disgust should be expressed by a constitutional channel or through a regulatory authority
  6. Strategy should keep evolving or else the subscribers get bored
  7. Competitors should stay away from mudslinging as it defames the entire domain
  8. The core agenda of a company should always remain intact
  9. The investors and their interests should always be respected
  10. The company should strive to increase its subscriber base and not lose the existing subscriber base

 

Picture Courtesy: – www.startupplays.com

He was a smart developer. He teamed up with his smart MBA friend and couple of other IT guys to create a trailblazing product in the e-commerce domain. They planned to launch the portal on 1st of January 2014. Even before their release, they created a lot of buzz in the market, although analysts doubted their success. Some even wrote them off. The start-up started well and got a lot of investors interested but soon it began losing its momentum. They started committing goof ups everyday. The goof ups soon turned into blunders. Investors started getting pissed and some even threatened to cancel the funding. Meanwhile lot of founding members quit as they weren’t happy with the way the start-up was going. 

The MBA guy who led the entire operation started smelling foul play and began wailing. He complained that the current market leaders are trying to topple his start-up. The smart developer even said that one of the current market leaders in the e-commerce domain called him on 31st of December 2013 and tried to hire him at fat pay package so that the new start-up gets toppled. However he refused and went ahead with the start-up. The MBA chap has now stopped working and is planning to do a protest outside the residence of the market leader’s COO. The investors are even more pissed. The old loyal subscribers of the market leader are having a good laugh about the new start-up and its weird strategies. The new subscribers of the start-up are confused, some have switched loyalties already.

 

I tried analyzing the scenario. This fails on a number of points:

 

  1. No market leader offers to topple a new start-up unless the latter is proved as a competition to it
  2. There should be proofs to justify that there have been unfair advances by the competitors
  3. One shouldn’t go to the public domain without facts and/or justifications
  4. Competition should always be in the priority list but work should always top that list
  5. Disgust should be expressed by a constitutional channel or through a regulatory authority
  6. Strategy should keep evolving or else the subscribers get bored
  7. Competitors should stay away from mudslinging as it defames the entire domain
  8. The core agenda of a company should always remain intact
  9. The investors and their interests should always be respected
  10. The company should strive to increase its subscriber base and not lose the existing subscriber base

 

Picture Courtesy: – www.startupplays.com

He was a smart developer. He teamed up with his smart MBA friend and couple of other IT guys to create a trailblazing product in the e-commerce domain. They planned to launch the portal on 1st of January 2014. Even before their release, they created a lot of buzz in the market, although analysts doubted their success. Some even wrote them off. The start-up started well and got a lot of investors interested but soon it began losing its momentum. They started committing goof ups everyday. The goof ups soon turned into blunders. Investors started getting pissed and some even threatened to cancel the funding. Meanwhile lot of founding members quit as they weren’t happy with the way the start-up was going. 

The MBA guy who led the entire operation started smelling foul play and began wailing. He complained that the current market leaders are trying to topple his start-up. The smart developer even said that one of the current market leaders in the e-commerce domain called him on 31st of December 2013 and tried to hire him at fat pay package so that the new start-up gets toppled. However he refused and went ahead with the start-up. The MBA chap has now stopped working and is planning to do a protest outside the residence of the market leader’s COO. The investors are even more pissed. The old loyal subscribers of the market leader are having a good laugh about the new start-up and its weird strategies. The new subscribers of the start-up are confused, some have switched loyalties already.

 

I tried analyzing the scenario. This fails on a number of points:

 

  1. No market leader offers to topple a new start-up unless the latter is proved as a competition to it
  2. There should be proofs to justify that there have been unfair advances by the competitors
  3. One shouldn’t go to the public domain without facts and/or justifications
  4. Competition should always be in the priority list but work should always top that list
  5. Disgust should be expressed by a constitutional channel or through a regulatory authority
  6. Strategy should keep evolving or else the subscribers get bored
  7. Competitors should stay away from mudslinging as it defames the entire domain
  8. The core agenda of a company should always remain intact
  9. The investors and their interests should always be respected
  10. The company should strive to increase its subscriber base and not lose the existing subscriber base

 

Picture Courtesy: – www.startupplays.com

He was a smart developer. He teamed up with his smart MBA friend and couple of other IT guys to create a trailblazing product in the e-commerce domain. They planned to launch the portal on 1st of January 2014. Even before their release, they created a lot of buzz in the market, although analysts doubted their success. Some even wrote them off. The start-up started well and got a lot of investors interested but soon it began losing its momentum. They started committing goof ups everyday. The goof ups soon turned into blunders. Investors started getting pissed and some even threatened to cancel the funding. Meanwhile lot of founding members quit as they weren’t happy with the way the start-up was going. 

The MBA guy who led the entire operation started smelling foul play and began wailing. He complained that the current market leaders are trying to topple his start-up. The smart developer even said that one of the current market leaders in the e-commerce domain called him on 31st of December 2013 and tried to hire him at fat pay package so that the new start-up gets toppled. However he refused and went ahead with the start-up. The MBA chap has now stopped working and is planning to do a protest outside the residence of the market leader’s COO. The investors are even more pissed. The old loyal subscribers of the market leader are having a good laugh about the new start-up and its weird strategies. The new subscribers of the start-up are confused, some have switched loyalties already.

 

I tried analyzing the scenario. This fails on a number of points:

 

  1. No market leader offers to topple a new start-up unless the latter is proved as a competition to it
  2. There should be proofs to justify that there have been unfair advances by the competitors
  3. One shouldn’t go to the public domain without facts and/or justifications
  4. Competition should always be in the priority list but work should always top that list
  5. Disgust should be expressed by a constitutional channel or through a regulatory authority
  6. Strategy should keep evolving or else the subscribers get bored
  7. Competitors should stay away from mudslinging as it defames the entire domain
  8. The core agenda of a company should always remain intact
  9. The investors and their interests should always be respected
  10. The company should strive to increase its subscriber base and not lose the existing subscriber base

 

Picture Courtesy: – www.startupplays.com

Tags: 20132014UP
ShareTweetSend
Previous Post

Celebrations, Love and Saraswati

Next Post

2014 Express – Tier-III

Atul Kumar Mishra

Atul Kumar Mishra

Lovable Narcissist | Whiskey Lover | Dharma Warrior | Founder, The Frustrated Indian | CEO, tfipost.com

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms of use and Privacy Policy.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

  • Most Read
  • Comments
  • Latest
Xi Jinping, coronavirus, Shinzo Abe, china, Japan, coornavirus, COVID-19, Wuhan Virus

‘Pack up and get out of there,’ Japan to spend $2.2 billion to get Japanese companies to exit China

9 April 2020
ajay devgn karan johar

The man who bullied the Bully – How Ajay Devgn made Karan Johar’s monopoly a joke and forced him to apologize

22 June 2020
Huawei, China, Trump, USA, Xi Jinping

‘Our survival is at stake now,’ Chinese Telecom giant Huawei crumbles after US ban on Semiconductor exports

19 May 2020
T-Series Sonu Nigam Divya Khosla Kumar Bhushan Kumar

T-Series forced to take down Atif Aslam’s video, Divya Khosla trolled. T-Series has a bad day in office

25 June 2020
Meat Ban

A Jain responds to Meat Ban in Mumbai

Public Sector Bank, Government, Bill

Dear bank employees, continue your stride but PSBs will be privatized

anti-Hindi

Anti-Hindi Forever?- In search of a National Language!

Dear Liberals – your Beef Parties are not protests, they just intend to displease the Majority

Dear Liberals – your Beef Parties are not protests, they just intend to displease the Majority

Digvijay is not Congress; Congress leaders are not Congress; then who represents Congress? convicted Rahul Gandhi?

Digvijay is not Congress; Congress leaders are not Congress; then who represents Congress? convicted Rahul Gandhi?

31 March 2023
Bhutan PM statement

Bhutan’s unfortunate statement on Doklam stalemate

31 March 2023
The cat and mouse game between the Indian government and Zakir Naik, and why Naik is winning

The cat and mouse game between the Indian government and Zakir Naik, and why Naik is winning

31 March 2023
Balochistan India

Nehru’s Historic Blunder: Why Balochistan Remains Disconnected from India

31 March 2023

Popular This Week

Priyanka Chopra
Cinema

Priyanka Chopra is often off the mark, but this time she has hit the bull’s eye

by Paurush Gupta
29 March 2023
Yami Gautam
Cinema

Why Yami Gautam should get films more often

by Sabita Mishra
28 March 2023
Physics Wallah controversy
Opinions

Physics Wallah controversy: The day Alakh Pandey decided to become an internet sensation is the day Physics Wallah died

by Shubham Bajpai
30 March 2023
Rahul Gandhi
Analysis

A bigger conspiracy lies behind Rahul Gandhi’s ouster

by Paurush Gupta
27 March 2023
Renuka Chowdhury will file a defamation case against PM Modi
Opinions

A point-by-point rebuttal on Renuka Chowdhury’s rants

by Paurush Gupta
26 March 2023

©2023 TFI Media Private Limited

  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
No Result
View All Result
  • Premium
  • Politics
    • Analysis
    • Opinions
    • Trending
  • Economy
    • Business
    • Finance
  • Defense
    • Defence
    • Strategy
    • Weaponry
  • Geopolitics
    • Africa
    • Americas
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • South Asia
    • West Asia
  • Knowledge
    • Culture
    • History
    • Indology
  • Law
  • Lounge
    • Books
    • Cinema
    • Food
    • Health
    • Sports
    • technology
    • Travel
    • Satire
TFI Official Merchandise
TFI हिन्दी
TFI Global
  • About us
  • Careers
  • Brand Partnerships

©2023 TFI Media Private Limited

Follow us on Twitter

and never miss an insightful take by the TFIPOST team

Follow @tfipost