Assam has taken a firm step in its internal security strategy by banning what it identifies as jihadi literature associated with Bangladesh-based extremist groups. The decision marks a significant expansion of the state’s ongoing efforts to counter radicalisation and prevent the influence of cross-border terror organisations. The core message of the move is that the government wants to stop the spread of extremist ideology before it reaches vulnerable groups.
The ban was announced through an order of the Home and Political Department, invoking provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The order prohibits the printing, publishing, distribution, circulation, sale and even possession of any jihadi literature or digital material linked to proscribed organisations such as Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh, Ansarullah Bangla Team and allied groups. The crux of the government’s reasoning is that such materials promote violent ideology, threaten communal harmony and pose a direct challenge to state and national security.
Authorities explained that the ban is not limited to physical books or pamphlets. It extends equally to online content. This means that websites, social media pages, encrypted messaging groups and cloud-stored material containing radical propaganda now fall under the scope of the prohibition. The central idea behind this digital inclusion is that extremist messaging today spreads faster online than in print, and therefore regulation must cover both physical and virtual channels.
The government’s decision to ban jihadi literature follows a series of intelligence reports and investigations by Assam Police and the Special Task Force. These agencies reported that radical content connected to Bangla-based outfits had been circulating within the state and had allegedly been used in attempts to indoctrinate young people. Several past arrests on charges of facilitating extremist activities, including suspected recruitment, added urgency to the government’s response. The crux of these findings pointed to a pattern where radical literature acted as both propaganda and a recruiting tool.
The order stresses that such jihadi literature violates the sovereignty and integrity of India. Officials argue that violent extremist ideology, even when presented in the form of texts, videos or digital manuals, is a threat that can lead to real-world consequences. The government has identified the prevention of communal tension as another major reason for the ban. The crux repeated throughout the order is that the circulation of radical content has the potential to fuel division and disrupt public order.
To ensure implementation, the government has directed various law-enforcement units to enforce the ban. These include the Special Branch, the CID, district police units, cyber-crime wings and intelligence agencies. They have been authorised to seize prohibited materials and take legal action under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and relevant laws under the Information Technology Act. The emphasis in the order is on immediate forfeiture of banned items, meaning agencies are empowered to act without delay.
Another part of the government’s reasoning deals with the rising use of encrypted communication channels. The order notes that extremist material (jihadi literature ) often circulates in private online groups, making it difficult to track. By bringing all forms of digital distribution under the ban, the government aims to curb the quiet spread of indoctrination. The crux of this approach is that counter-extremism in the modern era requires strong oversight of both public and private digital spaces.
Supporters of the decision argue that Assam, given its geographical location near international borders, remains vulnerable to cross-border extremist influence. They believe the ban on jihadi literature is necessary to prevent the establishment of ideological networks that could later evolve into operational ones. The government has highlighted that such efforts form part of a broader security framework intended to protect young citizens from manipulation by violent groups.
Critics, however, have raised concerns about potential overreach and the need to ensure that legitimate academic or religious materials are not wrongly targeted. They argue that the implementation must be balanced and backed by clear definitions to avoid misuse. But even among sceptics, there is an acknowledgement that extremist propaganda poses real risks that must be addressed through decisive measures.
At the centre of the issue is a persistent concern shared across India’s security apparatus: the attempt by banned foreign organisations to spread ideological influence through jihadi literature within the country. Radical literature, whether distributed physically or digitally, is one of the most accessible tools for such organisations. The ban reflects a belief that stopping the spread of these writings now is essential for preventing larger security challenges later.
Assam’s decision is among the most comprehensive bans of its kind by any state in India. By targeting the ideological pipeline at its source, the government hopes to reduce the possibility of vulnerable individuals being drawn into violent networks. The crux of the state’s policy is simple: removing extremist materials prevents extremist influence.
As the state begins to enforce the order, its long-term effectiveness will depend on sustained surveillance, inter-agency coordination and continued public awareness. The ban on jihadi literature is part of a wider attempt to ensure that Assam’s social fabric remains secure from external radicalising forces.