The Hindu Past of Nepal and Why is it a Failed State  

Since its very formation Nepal has been rooted in and around the Sanatan-Hindu Philosophy. Moreover the Historical Pride that Nepali Kings and Queens Undertook as the ‘True Guardians of the Hindu Faith is Undeniable.

Since its very formation Nepal has been rooted in and around the Sanatan-Hindu Philosophy. Moreover the Historical Pride that Nepali Kings and Queens Undertook as the ‘True Guardians of the Hindu Faith is Undeniable.

Nepal : The Meaning 

Nepal : If you look for its etymology it is nothing less than Ancient and Legendary : The Literal Translation of ‘Nepal’ as Suggested by Nepali Saints is “ it is the Land Protected by the Son of Lord Brahma , the Creator of the Universe”. Legend has it that Once there Existed a Saige ‘Ne’ and he Protected the Himalayas to the Northeast , and in local Languages ‘ To protect is called Pala’. Thus came the Word ‘Nepal’.

Thus since its very formation Nepal has been rooted in and around the Sanatan-Hindu Philosophy. Moreover the Historical Pride that Nepali Kings and Queens Undertook as the ‘True Guardians of the Hindu Faith is Undeniable’.

 

The Hindu Glory : 

This can be inferred as the Most Revered Ruler of the Nepalese who Unified and set foundation of the Modern Day Nepal – Gorkha King Prithvi Narayan Shah Declared  his unified Kingdom as   ‘Asal Hindustan’ that directly translates to the ‘True Lands of The Hindus’.

Shah, Started his Conquest of Unifying the Kingdom of Nepal in 1743 and by 1768 He had Finally Achieved it. As a result In Modern History the Nepalese Monarchy was one of the most Long Standing Nearing A Massive 240 Years in Power.

 

The Kingdom saw Great days, in trade, commerce, culture and Art Alike. Nepal was by Geography an Important Player, to its west it had Tibet and to East it Had India. Thus its  Trade Influence on Tibet was Strong. Nepal even minted coins used in Tibet, strengthening its role as an economic hub.

Adding to all of this Nepal Was Never Colonised, something the Nation Always iterates with pride and Glamour till date.

 

The Chakra of Time –

However as is the concept of time, it changes and it did but many argue it was for the worse of Nepal. 

Centuries went by and Naturally Complacency set in, leading to distrust and skepticism in the society against the Royalty. 

The Monarchs did try to bring in some changes like the introduction of a Modern Parliamentary framework in the year 1951 by  King Tribhuvan. 

However the reforms were deemed hollow when another royal member King Mahendra Staged a Coup in 1960 and Banned all Political Parties, and brought in a centralised system, it was called the ‘ Panchayat System’. This ensured The Sole Power now lay with the Monarchy. 

 

The Years to follow saw Protests again, which over time became mass movements and in 1990 a ‘People’s Movement’ made The then King demolish the Panchayat System and Bring in Multi-party Democracy !

Nevertheless these Steps were Propagated to be ‘Too Little’ and thus it set the stage for (Any Guesses ? ) – A Communist Armed Insurgency. It was Initiated in 1996.

 

 

The Communist Insurgency Begins 

The Communist Insurgency spearheaded by Pushpa Kamal Dahal, also  known as “Prachanda” Lasted For about a Decade and Took Away 17,000 Lives, a great toll specially for a Tender Nation Like Nepal.

 

The Communists also benefited deeply from what is one of the darkest stories you will ever hear. To understand the Following event that Shook Nepal to its core better, you need to know the characters at its centre. There was this Ruler – King Birendra, the monarch of Nepal since 1972, he was not just another ruler though. He was educated at Eton and Harvard, worldly yet deeply traditional, remembered for his calm dignity. Ordinary Nepalis saw him as a gentle king, a father figure who walked softly but carried centuries of Hindu kingship on his shoulders. Birendra wasn’t known for harshness in fact, many admired his openness and his sense of fairness in dealing with both tradition and the rising call for democracy. 

 

In the palace by his side was Queen  Aishwarya, elegant, proud, and protective of the dynasty. And then there was their son, Crown Prince Dipendra – the heir to the throne, educated in England and loved by many, but restless, fiery, and burdened by the expectations of his royal lineage.

Among the people, King Birendra was cherished. Street vendors in Kathmandu would tell you he was ‘the king who listened.’ Farmers in the hills remembered him as ‘a king who cared for his people.’ Even in the turbulence of the 1990s, when Nepal became a constitutional monarchy, he was respected as a stabilizing force : a king who had gracefully accepted the people’s demand for democracy. In him, the monarchy still carried a sacred Aura.

 

The Literal Fall of The Royalty

 

But in June 2001, that aura shattered in a single night of gunfire. On the night of June 1st, 2001, Crown Prince Dipendra, furious over his family’s rejection of his chosen bride, and reportedly intoxicated, opened fire inside the Royal Palace. In minutes, King Birendra, Queen Aishwarya, and almost the entire royal lineage lay dead. The nation woke to horror, their beloved king, a man respected even by critics, was gone in a blood-soaked massacre carried out by his own son. In a surreal twist, Dipendra, though lying in a coma from a self-inflicted gunshot, was declared king. For three days, Nepal had a monarch who never woke to rule, a perfect symbol of chaos, crowned in silence, and then gone with his final breath. For Nepalis, the night of June 1, 2001 was not just the death of a king it was the death of innocence.

 

Aftermath

When Dipendra died, the crown passed to Gyanendra, Birendra’s brother. But unlike Birendra, Gyanendra was not loved. He was seen as aloof, hard, untrustworthy — whispers spread that he had somehow benefitted from the massacre. The aura of sacred kingship was shattered. For ordinary Nepalis, the monarchy no longer seemed divine; it seemed human, fragile, and tainted with suspicion. And in that collapse of faith, the Maoists found their moment. With the crown tarnished and mistrust festering, their cry to tear down the monarchy and build a people’s republic rang louder than ever.

Fast Forward to 2005 King Gyanendra took direct control of State Authority to Repel Maoist insurgency. This was the final nail in the coffin for the Monarchy and Mass Scale Demonstrations. The King abandoned the rule in 2006 and the Monarchy Officially Ended in 2008 !!

 

Turbulence Post Freedom : 

However the Journey has not exactly been Steady Since then as well. In 17 years the Country has seen 14 Governments. That gives a petty average of 1.2 Years per rule.

Now, there are a lot of things that can explain this issue.

However, One of the Main Reason as suspected by experts and civilians of Nepal alike is their PR System 

 

PR System 

You see, In Nepal, voters don’t just choose a candidate from their district they also vote for political parties. A set of Parliament seats are then shared out in proportion to the total votes each party wins nationwide. So if a party gets 30% of the votes, it gets about 30% of the seats. But here’s the catch: those proportional seats aren’t chosen directly by the people. They are filled from a closed list prepared by party leaders, which means it is the bosses in Kathmandu who decide who sits in parliament, not the voters themselves. On paper, this system was designed to be inclusive to give women, Dalits, Madhesis, Janajatis, and other minorities a guaranteed share of representation. In reality, it has often produced weak, short-lived governments, MPs who answer upward to their leaders instead to their people, and a parliament that is more fractured than united.

 

Poor system – Liminal Governance 

The biggest problem is that no single party ever wins enough seats to rule alone. Every government since 2008 has been a patchwork coalition of rivals, stitched together by bargaining and backroom deals. But fragile alliances collapse quickly. In 2013, the Maoists, who had dominated after the war, lost ground, and Congress and UML formed a coalition that unraveled within two years. In 2021, Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli dissolved parliament twice, blaming his coalition partners for betrayal, throwing the country into a constitutional crisis until the Supreme Court reinstated the house. These constant breakdowns make governance nearly impossible. Especially for a non-homogenous hilly state like Nepal 

The second issue is accountability. PR MPs owe their positions to party bosses, not to voters. Many Nepalis complain they don’t even know who their representative is, because names on party lists are often filled by loyalists, relatives, or financiers chosen in Kathmandu rather than by people themselves. This of course deepens the mistrust between citizens and politicians, making parliament feel like a closed club instead of a house of the Commoners.

 

The Latest Collapse

Now all of those fractures and cracks have naturally mounted over time , distrust in the core governance and position holders became unbearable after videos and photos of Nepali Politicians and their families enjoying jewels and vacation surfaced online.

The Youth was Cornered into ‘Confirmation Bias’ – which was : Oh here we beg for scraps and live a life of minimums but ‘they and their’ loyalists enjoy on our expense.

To curb this the Nepali government executed a ‘knee jerk Plan’ and Banned all Prominent Social Media outlets all together thus igniting a much-much wider fire.

In Mere days a large scale protest which readily turned violent was Undertaken.

.On September 9, anger peaked. Protesters torched the private residences of Nepal’s Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, President Ramchandra Poudel, and other leaders. Airports shut down. The army had to move  in.

By evening, Oli was gone, resigning under fire. Whispers suggest he may even flee to Dubai. 

Some Visuals and events from this Apparent Protest have shaken people to the core, it is one thing to demand in righteousness and another to demand in absolute Carnage and Carnage was what Nepal Saw.

 

Regardless the Protesting group have confirmed and Agreed on a Name Sushila Karki, the country’s first female Chief Justice. Karki’s history is dramatic. In 2016, she shattered barriers as Nepal’s first woman Chief Justice. A year later, lawmakers tried to impeach her after she overturned a controversial police chief appointment, an act many saw as a stand against political interference. Though the impeachment failed, she retired in 2017 under a cloud of controversy and Plausible Political Pressure.

 

The People Hold the Tomorrow

Now Whatever Comes next for the hill State one thing is for sure, it has seen immense Misfortune for its Proportion. From the Legends of Puras to the sacredness of its Mighty Hills and temples the Nation has fallen a long way. Its Fate now solely Remains in the Will of its people and only ‘time’ will truly tell if they can ‘Pala’ that is protect Nepal !

Exit mobile version