India is not even Bharat officially, and liberals are already howling

In recent times, there has been considerable speculation surrounding the motive behind the special session of the Parliament scheduled to convene from September 18 to 22. One theory that has gained momentum revolves around a possible name change for our country.

This theory gained momentum when an invite issued by the President of India to G20 dignitaries for a dinner event mentioned ‘The president of Bharat’. This intriguing choice of words has ignited discussions about whether India will now officially adopt the name ‘Bharat,’ which is the nation’s original moniker.

The speculation was further fueled by a tweet from Himanta Biswa Sarma, the Chief Minister of Assam. Sarma’s tweet read, ‘Republic of Bharat,’ and he expressed his happiness and pride that our civilization is boldly progressing towards ‘Amrit Kaal,’ which signifies a prosperous era.

Additionally, Times Now, citing sources, has suggested that it is likely that India could indeed undergo a ‘renaming’ process.

However, if this renaming is indeed true, it has already triggered strong reactions from the Congress-led Opposition. Jairam Ramesh, a prominent Congress leader, pointed out that the Rashtrapati Bhawan had issued an invite for a G20 dinner on September 9th in the name of ‘President of Bharat,’ instead of the customary ‘President of India.’ Ramesh commented that this change could potentially alter Article 1 in the Constitution, which states: “India, that is Bharat, is a Union of States.” He expressed concerns that even this ‘Union of States’ could be under threat.

Also read: Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury backs out of “One Nation One Election” committee moments after agreeing to be a part of it

While some reactions bordered on the extreme, such as a Twitter user speculating that the name change was motivated by fear of an ‘INDIA alliance’! Get a better excuse mate! On a serious note, Article 1 of the Constitution explicitly states, “India, that is Bharat, is a Union of States.” This means that whether we refer to it as Bharat or India, the essence of our nation remains the same.

In essence, the debate over India’s name change seems to be more about symbolism than any significant alteration to the nation’s identity or structure. ‘Bharat’ has deep-rooted historical and cultural significance, and for many, it represents a return to the nation’s ancient heritage.

However, it’s essential to recognize that a name change alone won’t fundamentally alter the country’s character or its status as a democratic republic. India, or Bharat, remains a diverse and dynamic nation with a rich tapestry of cultures, languages, and traditions. What matters most is the unity and progress of the country, regardless of the name it goes by.

Furthermore, as a nation with a long and complex history, it’s not uncommon for names to evolve or be adapted to reflect changing times and contexts. India has been known by various names throughout its history, including Bharat, Hindustan, and more. Each of these names carries its own significance and symbolism.

In the grand scheme of things, what truly matters is the collective journey of its people, the progress they make, and the principles that guide the nation. Whether we call it India or Bharat, these principles of democracy, diversity, and unity remain at the heart of our identity. Names may change, but the essence of a nation is defined by the people who call it home and the shared vision of a brighter future.

Support TFI:

Support us to strengthen the ‘Right’ ideology of cultural nationalism by purchasing the best quality garments from TFI-STORE.COM

Also Watch: