Brain-dead liberals didn’t want SC to prioritise Covid cases and now that SC isn’t, they want it to prioritise Covid cases

Liberals of the country are a paradoxical breed and time and again they prove themselves to be the biggest hypocrites and the liars who can go to untoward lengths to realise their twisted agendas. The recent controversy was sparked when the Supreme Court of India on Thursday took suo moto cognizance of oxygen shortage and mismanagement in the handling of the Covid-19 crisis. While different high courts were overseeing the oxygen supply across the country, the SC presided over the issue to streamline the entire process.

“We as a court wish to take suo moto cognisance of certain issues. We find that there are six high courts – Delhi, Bombay Sikkim, MP, Calcutta and Allahabad. They are exercising jurisdiction in best interest. But it is creating confusion and diversion of resources,” the three-judge bench headed by former Chief Justice of India SA Bobde said.

However, before the court even took up the issue, liberal lawyers like Indira JaiSing, Dushyant Dave, Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Vivek Tankha reportedly started crying hoarse and asked for the court to give up on the hearing without reading the fine details. In various interviews with different media houses, Dushyant Dave, who was representing the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) said that when the high courts were intervening, SC’s intervention was “unjustified”.

Vivek Tankha, a Congress member and advocate toed the line of Dave and even said that High Court enjoyed more public faith than the SC.

“SC is best suited to seek replies fr UOI on #COVIDEmergency2021 including #OxygenEmergency nationally. State high courts should be allowed to monitor at micro level. #SupremeCourt has neither time nor details to deal with challenges facing states.HC orders enjoy public faith,” he tweeted.

The former attorney general of India Mukul Rohatgi also didn’t want SC to prioritise the Covid cases as he remarked in an interview to LiveLaw “I completely disagree with the view of the Supreme Court. High courts are competent to deal with the issue as it unfolds in the concerned state. Local conditions and local problems and the solutions can be best addressed by them. It’s a retrograde step. High court will become redundant now.”

As a result, during the hearing, CJI Bobde rapped the senior lawyers for commenting without reading its order and said it had not transferred the cases to itself from high courts.

“You have imputed motives to us without reading our order,” said Bobde whilst giving a tap to Dave, who falsely questioned the SC’s decision to transfer cases.

“We never said a word and did not stop high courts, we had asked the Centre to go to high courts and report to them,” added the apex court. The bench then adjourned the Covid oxygen case to April 27 after the Centre sought time to file a response. The liberals interpreted this adjournment as the SC trying to stall the case, which can only be termed extreme buffoonery at best.

A Twitter user named Abhishek Dwivedi exposed the duplicity of the lawyers and liberals who were trying to weave the narrative that the court did not have the time to hear the case. “The allegation now on WhatsApp is that SC did not have time to hear the #OxygenCrisis matter. FALSE. Since yesterday, a campaign was led to block the hearing at SC. Supreme Court Bar Association filed an application opposing the hearing. Dushyant Dave led GHBA as well,” he tweeted.

Brain-dead liberals did not want SC to prioritise Covid cases and when the SC tried to coordinate the process between centre, state and the HC, the lawyers started creating roadblocks and manufactured a vile narrative of their own.

It is trying to understand where the liberals and their allegiances lie. Do they really want to help the public or merely want to stoke a controversy by undermining the authority of the SC?