Why should Malala have all the fun? Here’s presenting you Greta Thunberg, the new prop for left-liberal propaganda

As the countries across the globe are going through definite tilt towards the Right ideology and politics, the leftists are out of power and money and left with no distinct ideology, they are fighting for relevance. They are fast losing the perception battle as the public have realised the pitfalls of a leftist government and have become increasingly tired. Sensing that, the leftists have now stooped to using children as their propaganda tool with Malala being the prime example. As Malala’s true face and intentions now out in the open, it was proving to be too costly for the left to continue ton use the million-dollar scam that Malala is and hence, have now propped up a 16-year old Swedish girl, Great Thunberg to further their propaganda attempting to disrupt political democracies, this time on the topic of climate change.

Greta Thunberg took the world by storm as she burst on to the scene as a young girl fighting a lone battle for conserving the environment. Sadly, she has now been reduced to a mere propaganda tool by the left-liberals as the timing of Greta’s speech increasingly comes to question. There is no denying that Climate Change must be of the prime focus of every country but Greta by slamming the likes of the then UK Prime Minister and US President Trump signal towards definite propaganda. The left-liberal media across the world lapped up Greta’s speech and hailed her as a hero. The US elections are scheduled to be held next year and Greta is being used by the left to counter Donald Trump as the Democrats stand divided and propose radical and delirious proposals like the Green New Deal which would involve pumping of billions of dollars for little results. If there were any doubts that Greta’s appearance at the UN Climate Change summit was nothing but a PR and a staged event, Greta could be seen reacting angrily when Trump dropped by to watch Prime Minister Modi speak at the summit. That reaction went viral as the liberal media went all bonkers over her reaction. Needless to say, right from her script to her reaction and the timing of her appearance was all stage-managed. It is easy to slam world leaders over their efforts or lack of efforts to ensure a cleaner and a greener future. But she has been preaching for radical alarmist views not realising that for developing countries, it is extremely difficult to ensure sustainable development and move towards renewable sources of energy at a time when millions continue to live without 24/7 electricity supply, yet India has made massive strides in the Renewable Energy sector and is slated to achieve its goals as agreed during the Paris Agreement, a staggering eight years ahead of the schedule, which has been completely missing from Greta’s speeches and it would be foolish to expect a 16-year-old girl to be aware of such developments. The campaign that 16 year old Greta Thunberg is being made a face of is more political and radical than constructive. It has been reduced to a tool hijacked by left liberals for furthering a political agenda, and therefore it promises no real change, after its political outcome is achieved.

Greta started with noble intentions but sadly has been manipulated by the left who can go to any extent to further propaganda. Her speeches are often sensationalised and a tremendous PR machinery continues to make sure that she is always there in the news. She is now being projected as the antidote to Trump and its simply disgusting that a 16-year-old is being used by the left to win elections in the USA. Her family is also in a soup as there are claims that Greta was used by a Swedish Climate Change organisation We Don’t Have Time as its value rocketed by £1million shortly after Greta was invited on to its youth advisory board. A young student like Greta who has tremendous potential if left to hands of the hypocritical left-liberals will be reduced to Malala 2.0 who is nothing but a million-dollar scam, with little achievements. If the left dropped its hypocrisy and actually did constructive work on countering climate change, finding real solutions, setting real examples and assisting the developing world in managing its developmental aspirations in a sustainable way, instead of fielding a 16 year old against the prospect of Donald Trump’s reelection, this movement would have been more credible.